Dne 25.11.2013 03:15, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:05:28 AM
Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 22.11.2013 20:37, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
- Origin
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:05:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
>
> Dne 22.11.2013 20:37, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
> >
> > - Origin
Dne 22.11.2013 20:37, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:43:32 AM
Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
There is a pretty
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:43:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
>
> Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
> > There is a pretty severe bu
Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to
F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using
Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected
versions, just want
There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to
F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using
Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected
versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with pushing t
