Hi,
I am trying to connect changeset xml file located in the remote Guvnor 5.1
running in WAS7 server in a solaris box.
When I try to integrate the Guvnor using the KnowledgeAgent+Changeset but it
fails to read the changeset xml. It throws parser exception and 401
exception.
Remote Guvnor authent
Wolfgang,
Thanks very much for that explanation, it cleared up many questions.
"...If the order of your concurrently arriving events is essential, you
may have to insert an ordinal as a property..."
Can you expand on this idea or in an general practice for handling real
time streams of data
I'm answering my own questions today... the solution here was that the
insert object command MUST have an outIdentifier or results won't be
returned. it doesn't work to just set the returnObject boolean to true
(true is supposed to be the default). Once I set the outIdentifier when i
created the
also realized i missed a bit of the command xml when i pasted it above. at
the top should be:
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-server-empty-response-body-tp3192475p3192518.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi everyone,
I need to perform a count of facts, but my problem is that the facts are
nested inside other facts
My model would be something like this
a class called Cuscar that is like the main class that contains the other
facts
inside the class Cuscar I have a list called segmentGroup7 (privat
I should have said that I tried adding a Get Objects command to the batch,
but that did not change the behaviour.
com.abclegal.rules.integration.StatusChangeTestIntegration
0
0
PENDING
false
false
false
--
View this
I am new to calling Rest services and using drools-server. I configured the
camel-server.xml and knowledge-services.xml rest service to use xstream
marshalling, added my rules and pojo model to the war, and deployed it on
tomcat. I wrote a java http client to run the rest service. This is the
ba
finally realized the answer to my question is "you can't." In case there are
other newbies to Camel and Rest out there, I was able to run against
drools-server using xstream with the following code:
import org.apache.commons.httpclient.Header;
import org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient;
impo
Ok,
I added documentation for this and all other predefined type and field
annotations to the main drools expert document.
Edson
2011/7/22 Mark Proctor
> On 19/07/2011 06:07, Marc Heinz wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I need some enlightening about Drools "dynamic facts" (a term used
Can you just "insert" the result into working memory?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Sachin Thapa wrote:
> Most important thing, the attributes of result object must satisfy the
> firing
> condition of rule in which you want to use the result.
>
> http://technologistics.blogspot.com/
>
> --
>
Hi David,
i'm new in Drools Guvnor, i'm using guvnor 5.2 and JBoss AS 6.0 and i've the
same problem.
didi solve it?
best regards.
Sergio
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Guvnor-5-1-1-save-frequently-does-not-save-tp1558397p3192164.html
Sent fro
Most important thing, the attributes of result object must satisfy the firing
condition of rule in which you want to use the result.
http://technologistics.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-reuse-a-result-of-a-rule-in-an-other-rule-tp3182344p
On 19/07/2011 14:17, Vincent Legendre wrote:
>> AFAIK, there never was any logic for restricting updates of the Rete
>> structures according to individual field-oriented change notifications.
> As far I remember, JRules does.
JRules does not do "slot specific". Jess does and Clips will if you use
On 22/07/2011 17:17, Mark Proctor wrote:
On 19/07/2011 06:07, Marc Heinz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I need some enlightening about Drools "dynamic facts" (a term used in the
documentation, for facts that could be updated from outside the rule
engine).
The current documentation always list the "ins
Thanks for your help. I'll look in to doing it as a state machine, perhaps I
am making things more complex than they really are.
Edward.
- Original Message -
> In this particular case you can do
>
> $p1:person (name=="Alice")
> $p3:person (name=="David", this after[0,1] $p1)
> not per
On 19/07/2011 06:07, Marc Heinz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I need some enlightening about Drools "dynamic facts" (a term used in the
documentation, for facts that could be updated from outside the rule
engine).
The current documentation always list the "insert" method of a
StatefulKnowledgeSession
On 22 July 2011 17:07, Andre wrote:
> so the only possibilty would be to insert new events which signals that
> rule
> x has been fired ..?
>
> How is this related to the accumulate A/B/C problem?
-W
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/evaluating-different-a
so the only possibilty would be to insert new events which signals that rule
x has been fired ..?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/evaluating-different-aspects-of-the-same-event-tp3191232p3191636.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabbl
They fixed it :)
Archives are here: http://download.jboss.org/drools/release/
Op 22-07-11 14:25, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
The jars are on the jboss maven repository (see downloads page for link).
The community zips are still available on downloads.jboss.org server,
but apparently there's no a
Hi,
I'm pretty new to guvnor and jbpm. I have guvnor 5.2.0 final running, I'm
trying to extract the processes attached to a package using the
KnowledgeAgent api. I've successfully managed to create a process under the
mortgages package, however when I build a snapshot of the package the
processe
There is no way of telling how the A, B, C of your data relates to the rule.
Nothing there suggests that rules 1, 2, 3 select A, B, C, respectively.
-W
On 22 July 2011 14:41, Andre wrote:
> i want to accumulate on different properties of my event.
> i have 3 rules which all work in the same ma
i want to accumulate on different properties of my event.
i have 3 rules which all work in the same manner , accumulate on that event
and then work with that result
my rules are all like this
rule "Request counting Subject By Id"
when
$set: Set()
from accumulate($neu : RequestCtx
The jars are on the jboss maven repository (see downloads page for link).
The community zips are still available on downloads.jboss.org server,
but apparently there's no archive site with a list of links to those URL's,
we need to find a way to have that available automatically.
I 'll ask if they
Hi All, I wanted to download Drools 5.0 version but at the download site of JBoss I am getting the option for Drools 5.2.0 only. Please suggest me where I can find Drools 5.0. Thanks & Regards,Gaurav SilakariMailto: gaurav.silak...@tcs.com=-=-=Notice: The information contained i
Hi, I'm new to Drools.
I searched on the topics but I couldn't find anything useful.
---
My environment is
Windows 7 64bit
Java 1.6 jdk
Eclipse SDK 3.6
JBoss Tools 3.2.0 with latest drools plugin.
Drools 5.2 runtime
When I try to create a new Drools Project from eclipse ide,
My advice for designing datamodels and working with drools is to think of it as
a database and follow standard database normalization procedures.
Essentially drools in an in memory database which has a custom query and
trigger syntax implemented in a very efficient manner! Each Object type is a
The latter approach is particularly powerful we have a very simple but
amazingly flexible class called Affirmation which just have 3 fields - String
name, Object subject, Object value. This however gives most flexibility that
you need
Eg
rule "Hungry"
when
$person : Person(hoursSince
Thanks Wolfgang! It worked.
--- On Fri, 22/7/11, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
From: Wolfgang Laun
Subject: Re: [rules-users] temporal operator "includes" not working
To: "Rules Users List"
Date: Friday, 22 July, 2011, 11:29 AM
Interval-based events must have a property for their duration (in ms), not
On 22 July 2011 08:34, Marc Heinz wrote:
> > On 19 July 2011 13:42, Marc Heinz wrote:
> >> So, despite I have only updated one attribute of the fact (the age of a
> >> Person), all rules have been fired again, even if they had nothing to do
> >> with the said attribute, which could possibly prod
29 matches
Mail list logo