Personally, I have these set in Eclipse:-
-XX:MaxPermSize=512m -Xms512m -Xmx2048m
Lower values might work (I believe there is something about this in the
droolsjbpm-build-bootstrap\README.md).
With kind regards,
Mike
On 17 May 2012 15:23, anchi harij...@ovi.com wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to
Thanks Laune, I tried executing it after adding msgCtClass.writeFile(); but
it's still throwing the same exception.
If you could please share the version of lib files you are using along with
the file with the changes?
--
View this message in context:
Thanks. It works after setting this in run configuration:
-Xmx1500M -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
There is a note about setting VM arguments in eclipse.ini file (which is
only used for launching Eclipse). But it doesn't say about setting it in run
configuration. Maybe you might update it with this info.
Set-up of the classpath for compile and execute:
ADDON=javassist/javassist-3.16.1-GA/javassist.jar
root=/extra/drools-distribution-5.3.0.Final/binaries
tag=5.3.0.Final
export
In the RHS of the rule, the function calling by insert only return
ChargeDetailRefSeqEntity but not ChargeDetailEntity. That's why I think it
is not the area causing recursive activation of the rule.
Is that right?
--
View this message in context:
Good point. done.
On 18 May 2012 10:31, anchi harij...@ovi.com wrote:
Thanks. It works after setting this in run configuration:
-Xmx1500M -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
There is a note about setting VM arguments in eclipse.ini file (which is
only used for launching Eclipse). But it doesn't say about
Please post your complete question.
I notice your original question is showing as not accepted on nabble.
On 18 May 2012 10:39, Christina Lau lau.christ...@hit.com.hk wrote:
In the RHS of the rule, the function calling by insert only return
ChargeDetailRefSeqEntity but not ChargeDetailEntity.
Hi all,
I find an odd pattern in the audit log. When an Object is inserted to the
working memory, activation is created many times on same rule. The more
objects are inserted, the duplicated activations are growing exponentially
which degrade the performance a lot.
Here attached part of the
Please show the rule.
Exponentially growing activations can be caused by rules where the
same fact type is used more than once. You'll have to use constraints
inhibiting useless duplications, e.g.,
when
$a1: A()
$a2: A(this != $a1 )
then
-W
On 18/05/2012, Christina Lau
Hi There,
I'm new to drools and i'm having a problem with a rule which has an OR:
/* Rule 25_OFF
*/
rule 25_OFF
when
$p1:InferenceFactValue( param!=null, param.parameterName == sonar_8_cm,
$v1:param.valueFloat = 10
Did you take a look at the documentation?
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-integration-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e1070
Cheers
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Hrumph herman.p...@imail.org wrote:
What would one call with the outIdentifier to get a result?
--
When using or, only one pattern of the or expression will be bound.
So, at runtime, onlty one variable $p1 or $p2 exists, and the other is null so
the NPE at runtime.
By the way, I can't see you are using a or here, as you test exactly the same
things ...
- Mail original -
De: Joana
Hi Wolfgang
On 05/17/2012 06:31 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
you might also consider adding your own rule to one of the existing
verifyer DRL files. I think they are part of some .jar file, so all
you'd need to do is de-jar, edit, re-jar, or just fiddle with class
path if that's the way the
Pull requests are always welcome :)
I'll hold my breath for as long as humanly possible.
On 18 May 2012 14:07, Joe Ammann j...@pyx.ch wrote:
Hi Wolfgang
On 05/17/2012 06:31 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
you might also consider adding your own rule to one of the existing
verifyer DRL files. I
Hello List,
I recently migrated from Drools.5.0.1 to Drools.5.4.0 and I am having issues
when combining constraints with OR when custom operators are involved.
For example, the following rule:
rule r548695.1
no-loop true
dialect mvel
when
gnId : GN()
la : t547147( )
v1717 :
Hello,
I'm trying to use Guvnor but when i upload my POJO models that my DRL needs
i get a classnotfoundexception even though i uploaded the jar that has the
class in it first.
So i basically upload a jar that provides some common classes,utilities,
that have no dependencies other than on the
Yes I have read it. I now see that by specifying the 'outIdentifier' I get
the processInstanceId returned in the executionResults.
Thanks Mauricio,
Herm
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/ProcessInstance-from-StartProcessCommand-tp383p4001106.html
Sent
I think (not sure) that an uploaded jar must be complete by itself.
The only things (classes) it can reference must be in guvnor's classpath
(guvnor own libs and tomcat and java, but not current package other jars).
So :
- try using a single jar
- or put all your jars in guvnor classpath
Thanks, that makes sense. I was suspecting that would be the case. I'll
give that a go.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Classnotfound-exception-on-POJO-model-upload-in-guvnor-tp4001060p4001282.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
19 matches
Mail list logo
