This means that it cannot find your method. To be able to call a method from
within a rule you will need to import the respective class that has the method
and then use an instance to reference that method with (or just the method
without an instance if it is static and you did static import). T
ontext:
>> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/RuleBase-Question-tp887326p887326.html
>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> ___
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/
I had to do something like this. The way I did it is by prividing a
method in my object in working memory that takes multiple Boolean
conditions and loops through them and return true if at least N of the
conditions were true. So, this funtions will take N and a list of all
conditions. Then
Interesting. Is there a reason for that? That doesn't sound too
efficient. How can I get around it so that everything in the drools
API uses the same default application classloader? Is there a setting
or configuration somewhere that would tell drools to just use the
default classloader? Th
the documentations or the historic threads on this
board. Maybe someone can shed some light on how this works behind the
scenes. Thank you.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Moe Alkhafaji wrote:
> Is there maybe a way to add those KnowledgePackages at startup time but
> somehow make them &
iPhone
On May 3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Moe Alkhafaji
wrote:
I see. Thanks Rajnikant. I appreciate the assistance. I hope there
would be a way to maybe make this more internal to the KnowledgeBase
object itself, or define another object for this type of caching
instead of creating this complexi
;
> In case of our application it does so by a very significant factor.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajnikant Gupta
> http://rkthinks.wordpress.com/
>
>
> 2010/5/3 Moe Alkhafaji
>
>> Hmmm, so you are suggesting I keep caches all possible combinations of
>> KnowledgePa
his is valid only if you are not changing your rules. If your
rules are changing from time to time, you may have to look at
caching at more lower levels.
I am not sure whether this can be helpful in your case but this is
often helpful.
Regards,
Rajnikant Gupta
http://rkthinks.wordpress
Thanks for the reply. But I don't understand what you mean by caching
the KnowledgeBase. This is about adding a pre compiled
KnowledgePackage to a KnowledgeBase. So, how does caching a
KnowledgeBase makes addition of new KnowledgePackage faster? Please
excuse my ignorance if I am not catchi
You will
> need to add constraints for that in a similar way to Pavel's suggestion.
>
>[]s
>Edson
>
>
> 2010/3/9 Moe Alkhafaji
>
>> Thanks Pavel. I was hoping for more of a transparent functionality
>> supported by Drools than have my users add tho
Can't you deduce from some other
> object that action was done? Than you should avoid Status object.
>
> Pavel
>
> 2010/3/9 Moe Alkhafaji :
> > Thanks Pavel. I was hoping for more of a transparent functionality
> > supported by Drools than have my users add those
> Pavel
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: c...@medcpu.com
This messa
g. salience -100 which
> will fire as "default" when nothing match.
>
> But maybe I'm totally out of scope
>
> Pavel
>
> 2010/3/9 Moe Alkhafaji :
> > So, in continuation of the main subject of the email. Unfortunately, I
> > cannot use activation gr
is, super, etc. with no success. If it is inaccessible, then
why the heck it is telling me it is a duplicate when I try to declare it? :)
Thanks guys and gals!
2010/3/8 Edson Tirelli
>
> Thanks for letting us know. Good luck!
>
> Edson
>
> 2010/3/8 Moe Alkhafaji
>
&
e fine.
>
> 2010/3/7 Moe Alkhafaji
>
> OK. I am using the following environment items:
>>
>> Eclipse: 3.3.2.
>> Plugins/Features from the link you provided below.
>>
>> Drools runtime 5.0.1
>>
>> I still see the same error in Eclipse, however, I
ob/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
>
>Eclipse 3.5.2.
>
>Drools runtime 5.0.1.
>
>
>Edson
>
> 2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji
>
>> Edson,
>>
>> Just to make sure, can you please send me the link of where you downloaded
>> your E
no error in my eclipse either, so I guess you have some other
> problem (maybe in your environment) going on there...
>
>
>Edson
>
>
> 2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji
>
>> Thanks Edson. I wish I can send a screen shot, but I just had a bunch of
>> white lines in the file
60:266='extends',<7>,11:28]; expecting
type THENMPU/src/rulesEEphratOBMain.drl
2010/3/5 Edson Tirelli
>
>These error messages don't make much sense to me, but it is accusing
> error on line 19 now... considering that I removed lines and the error
ions
> 1.1"
> when
>
> eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_TEST))
> then
> mpr.print("Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed");
> end
>
> Also, remember that unless you use some of the tricks I mentioned
> before, bo
s_Frequency))
eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_TEST))
then
mpr.print("Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed");
end
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Moe Alkhafaji wrote:
> Specifically speaking, here is what I get on Eclipse when
rlline 11
Syntax error, insert ";" to complete
Statement MPU/src/rules
EEphratOBMain.drlline 11
Line 11 is:
* rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"*
and "Definitions TermContractions 1.1" is another rule
this message in context:
>> http://n3.nabble.com/Inheritance-Like-Design-Question-tp430848p430848.html
>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> ___
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>
Is there a way to maybe annotate rules so my server side application
can interpret this annotation as inheritance flag or something?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:09 AM, malkhafaji
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I know, from searching this forum and posting before, that the
> concept o
23 matches
Mail list logo
