Hello Miguel,
I would like to chip in and help complete the work ! I am sorry as
I could not work on this. Anytime is good for me.
Thanks,
Amit.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:50 PM, mmarco wrote:
> Ticket #17030 contains Amit Jamagadni's implementation of knot theory done
> in 2014 GSoC, an
number of crossings (as only matrix
> multiplication is involved). From a quick look at ticket #17030, that's not
> the case for the existing implementation which appears to implement
> Kauffman's O(2^{O(#crossings)}) algorithm (please correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> - Søren
Hello Soren,
Thanks for sharing the work. But we do have been working on Knot
Theory and here is the ticket
Ticket : http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17030, which is currently under
review. It would be helpful if you compare the missing features as the work
on calculations of Jones polynomia
Hello Simon,
Here is the ticket on Knot Theory
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17030. There are some more tickets which
are related to the HOMFLY polynomial computation, which is being packaged
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18047.
ᐧ
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Simon King wrote:
> H
Hello Miguel,
I have few queries, not related to the questions though :
1. I have read through the readme and as I understand the input that the
package uses is a bit different. So it would be really helpful to know how
all of this will fit together with the current input ??
2. Given, if t
Hello everyone,
I have setup the git-trac-enable using the source enable.sh and also
have set the username and password using
git trac config --user USERNAME --pass ''.
It prompts me to give in a password
~/sage$ git trac push 17030
Pushing to Trac #17030...
Guessed remote branch: u/a
ng is going into $SAGE_ROOT and
> running "make build". If that doesn't work, there's always the nuclear
> option "make distclean && make".
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 4:18:49 PM UTC-5, Amit Jamadagni w
Hello everyone,
I have been working on the knot theory module. I have pushed all my
work onto github. Recently I created a ticket #17030, and have added the
trac details. Here is what I get when I do a
git remote -v
origin https://github.com/amitjamadagni/sage (fetch)
origin https://githu
Hello John,
Thanks for the reply but sage shell does not detect the link class
which is in link.py. I have added an empty file __init__.py. Any help on
this ?? Thanks
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:06 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 22, 2014 11:29:51 AM UTC-7, Amit Jam
Hello everyone,
I have been working on writing a Link class and integrating
into Sage as a part of GSoC 2014. I have managed to get the code working
and tested it by loading the file into Sage environment. But when I make a
new folder called knots and add the link.py into it and try
can do it in phases, initially writing wrappers
(temporary basis) for the less important and then partially moving
everything in. These are my thoughts as of now.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Amit Jamadagni wrote:
> Yes, with some pointers I guess I can pull it off. But re-writing would
>
:23 UTC+2, Amit Jamadagni escribió:
>
>> Hello all,
>> We (me under the mentorship of Miguel) have been working on
>> the implementation of Knot theory in Sage as a part of GSoC 2014 and would
>> like to hear your thoughts on the following subject.
>> We
Hello all,
We (me under the mentorship of Miguel) have been working on
the implementation of Knot theory in Sage as a part of GSoC 2014 and would
like to hear your thoughts on the following subject.
We got introduced to the Braid progamme (
http://www.layer8.co.uk/maths/braids/index
Hello Sampath,
I have tried to install kash and here are the results I get by
passing in the commands you have passed
sage: K. = NumberField(x^13 + 3*x + 5)
sage: K.galois_group()
---
TypeError
I have been going through the implementation Knot Atlas, as per my
understanding they have stored the knots in a table and have inputted it to
get various results, I would like to know whether we will be using tables
to input or any other way to input. I have seen through Vogel's algorithm
which t
Hello Volker,
Thanks for the reply. As I have posted in the recent
threads, I would like to discuss this project and have created a thread for
the same on the sage-gsoc group. I hope you've had a look at it (
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-gsoc/tb2O7zEoUx0) , it would
b
Hello Vincent,
Thanks for the reply. I wanted to work on the implementation as
it was mentioned in the ideas page(
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15v7lXZR1U4H2pT21d2fyPduYGb74JAFjkXJ6CWYmYfw/pub).
I have introduced myself and posted about the same on the sage-gsoc google
group. I wa
Hello,
I am a student and I would like to participate in SoC. I have
already posted about my interest on working about the implementation of
Knot Theory. Is it necessary that the message be forwarded to mentors or
any other mailing list other than this one ?? Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014
Hello,
A review on the ticket would be great
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15003. Thanks.
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Amit Jamadagni wrote:
> Hello,
> I have tried to resolve the issue. Any comments would be helpful.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014
Hello,
I have tried to resolve the issue. Any comments would be helpful.
Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Never copy&paste code around. Just call gamma from factorial.
>
>
> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:13:47 PM UTC, Amit Jamadagni wr
Hello,
I was going through this ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15003. The factorial should return
gamma(x+1) which is the necessary answer, can this be directly called or
should there be a replication of the code from gamma implementation.I was
going through real_mpfi.pyx. This
Hello,
Hello,
I have setup sage and have gone through some of the issues. I have
also gone through the Developer Guide (
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/index.html) but there seems to be
requirement of creating a account by sending in the details to the
specified google gro
22 matches
Mail list logo
