As usual,
tests are needed. There were problems in the past with the pretty old
and outdated "tar" on Mac OS X 10.4.11. As long as this continues to
work OK "out of the box", I'm fine with changes. Could you place
somewhere a "foobar.tar.bz2" where the "new" tar is used, so others
can check it ou
Georg S. Weber wrote:
> As usual,
>
> tests are needed. There were problems in the past with the pretty old
> and outdated "tar" on Mac OS X 10.4.11. As long as this continues to
> work OK "out of the box", I'm fine with changes. Could you place
> somewhere a "foobar.tar.bz2" where the "new" tar
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> Georg S. Weber wrote:
>> As usual,
>>
>> tests are needed. There were problems in the past with the pretty old
>> and outdated "tar" on Mac OS X 10.4.11. As long as this continues to
>> work OK "out of the box", I'm fine with changes. Co
Hi,
I updated tar on sage.math to version 1.22 by building from source.
I also updated rsync to the latest version (this was another request, offlist).
William
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:19 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> Georg S. Weber
