2009/9/3 Golam Mortuza Hossain :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, William A. Stein wrote:
sage: var('i')
i
sage: a = i^2
sage: a.simplify_full()
-1
>> I think my email must have not been clear. I think it's an instance
>> of a *HUGE BUG* in Sage. No more, no l
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, William A. Stein wrote:
>>> sage: var('i')
>>> i
>>> sage: a = i^2
>>> sage: a.simplify_full()
>>> -1
> I think my email must have not been clear. I think it's an instance
> of a *HUGE BUG* in Sage. No more, no less. It's a bug, because
> irregardless of a
William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> What do you think of this:
I think you are right that this is a huge bug in our interface to maxima.
Jason
--
Jason Grout
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Sep 3, 2009, at 12:49 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2:28 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage-Devel,
>>
>> What do you think of this:
>>
>> sage: var('x, i')
>> sage: solve(x^2 + i == 0, x)
>> [x == -sqrt(-I), x == sqrt(-I)]
>>
>> Basically, I make a purely symbolic variable which I h
On Sep 3, 2:28 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> What do you think of this:
>
> sage: var('x, i')
> sage: solve(x^2 + i == 0, x)
> [x == -sqrt(-I), x == sqrt(-I)]
>
> Basically, I make a purely symbolic variable which I happen to call
> "i", and it gets treated somewhere (presumably
