On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:04 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> These all sound like awesome ideas to me for moving more *robustly* to a
> sws -> ipynb transition! Would attached files work properly (or at all)?
> I'm only asking out of ignorance.
>
No, attached files would likely be placed next to the noteb
These all sound like awesome ideas to me for moving more *robustly* to a
sws -> ipynb transition! Would attached files work properly (or at all)?
I'm only asking out of ignorance.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:48:05AM +0100, MinRK wrote:
[...]
>- document conversion from sagenb to ipynb
We should probably better focus on a good rst2ipynb translator.
Indeed, there is a "sage -sws2rst" command already. This will have the
benefit to be helpful for more people than just
Thanks Jason for cross-posting.
Since the issue of funding was brought up, I think supporting projects like
this is exactly the sort of thing we should be doing with the funding we
have, whether the work sits on the Jupyter or Sage side (I assume there
will be both). It’s a bit tricky to keep trac