Hi,
I've tried
sage-6.10.rc1-Ubuntu_14.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
on a x86-64 laptop with Ubuntu 14.04.
I've noticed some issues:
1/ The patching at first run took ages (12 min on Intel Core i5-2410 M
with 4 GB RAM)
(maybe one should warn the user about this, since he might expect a
binary to run
I have same problem with 16.04 using binary, but I compiled it
successfully with not problem.
Le 15/12/2015 10:41, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
Hi,
I've tried
sage-6.10.rc1-Ubuntu_14.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
on a x86-64 laptop with Ubuntu 14.04.
I've noticed some issues:
1/ The patching at first run
On 2015-12-13 14:46, Volker Braun wrote:
> 0a59435 Updated Sage version to 6.10.rc1
All tests passed with "make ptestlong" and cloned freshly on Linux Mint
17.2.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Can users still contribute binaries under this new packaging? Especially
for other Linuces and older Mac OS that would be something we want to
encourage.
Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new binary packaging. That
> is, now binaries are patched automatically on first run, no m
Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:08:13 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Can users still contribute binaries under this new packaging? Especially
> for other Linuces and older Mac OS that would be something we want to
> encourage.
>
>
--
You recei
Two optional tests fails (perhaps this is already known):
$ ./sage --version
SageMath Version 6.10.rc1, Release Date: 2015-12-13
sage -t src/sage/groups/generic.py
**
File "src/sage/groups/generic.py", line 1388, in
sage.groups
> Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg
>
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:08:13 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> Can users still contribute binaries under this new packaging? Especially
>> for other Linuces and older Mac OS that would be something we want to
>> encourage.
>>
>>
O
Yes. Patches to the documentation are welcome ;-)
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 8:53:23 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Yes, use https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg
>>
> Okay. Should we use this rather than `sage -bdist`?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi,
Le mardi 15 décembre 2015 10:41:49 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
>
> 2/ The Jupyter notebook opened with ./sage -n jupyter starts with an
> error message
>
> Failed to retrieve MathJax from '/nbextensions/mathjax/MathJax.js'
>
> Math/LaTeX rendering will be disabled.
>
The source of t
The cause of the 3D graphics issue is similar: in the binary version, the
symlink
SAGE_ROOT/local/share/jupyter/nbextensions/jsmol
points wrongly to a remnant of the buildbot:
/mnt/highperf/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidma/local/share/jsmol
w
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:35:12PM -0800, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
[...]
> The source of the problem may be a wrong symlink in the binary version:
>
> cd SageMath
> ls -l local/share/jupyter/nbextensions/mathjax
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 eric eric 120 déc. 14 03:28
> local/share/jupyter/nbextensions/m
this was a result of
b2094a8a (Jeroen Demeyer 2015-11-18 15:53:34 +0100 1402)
which did change
description = G._gap_().StructureDescription().__str__()
to
description = str(G._gap_().StructureDescription())
but these calls are not 100% the same:
sage: groups.matrix.GL(4,2
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:20:17 PM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Yes. Patches to the documentation are welcome ;-)
>
>
>
In this case, nice try - I haven't even used binary-pkg yet! If and when I
may try.
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 8:53:23 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:43:54 -0800 (PST), Volker Braun:
> Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new
> binary packaging. That is, now binaries are patched
> automatically on first run, no more relocation after that.
Thank you for that.
On a MacBook Air running OS X 10.10.5, I downloaded
14 matches
Mail list logo