It's my fault as I wrote the code. if the given degree d fails the test
d>1 then it's assumed to be 1 (even if d<0!!). As William says, raising an
error would be better, so this should be fixed.
John
On Friday, March 23, 2012 6:08:36 PM UTC, Ken Ribet wrote:
>
> On Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:44:43 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Kenneth A. Ribet wrote:
> >
> > Consider this short sage transcript:
> >
> > sage: E=EllipticCurve(GF(3),[1,1])
> > sage: for i in range(3):
> > ... print i,E.order(extension_degree=i)
> > 0 4
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Kenneth A. Ribet wrote:
>
> Consider this short sage transcript:
>
> sage: E=EllipticCurve(GF(3),[1,1])
> sage: for i in range(3):
> ... print i,E.order(extension_degree=i)
> 0 4
> 1 4
> 2 16
>
> Sage seem to think that E has 4 points over the field with 1 el
Consider this short sage transcript:
sage: E=EllipticCurve(GF(3),[1,1])
sage: for i in range(3):
... print i,E.order(extension_degree=i)
0 4
1 4
2 16
Sage seem to think that E has 4 points over the field with 1 element. Was this
intended?
Ken
--
To post to this group, send email to sag
