You could run a chkconfig --del winbindd an then reboot. That way it won't
start and you won't have to "kill".
Cheers,
Travis
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: sneezewort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:40:19 PM GMT-07
Hi,
Samba: samba-3.0.21
OS: OpenBSD
I built a new WinXP (sp2 and fully updated) box with the the idea of
making a Default User profile. I followed the directions in the "Making
Happy Users" section of the Samba-3 By Example guide.
http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/happy.h
sneezewort wrote:
You can ping with "wbinfo -p" command.
I can't stop winbind, in fact I cant even "kill" it by pid. I even tried to
reboot, but winbindd is still unkillable, and no wbinfo or "net join"
commands work. I tried to do a full uninstall and reinstall, but the problem
remains.
--
View
You can ping with "wbinfo -p" command.
I can't stop winbind, in fact I cant even "kill" it by pid. I even tried to
reboot, but winbindd is still unkillable, and no wbinfo or "net join"
commands work. I tried to do a full uninstall and reinstall, but the problem
remains.
--
View this message in co
File this under the "this used to work" section.
Particulars:
Version: 3.0.13
Build source: Source RPM
OS/Distribution: RedHat Enterprise Linux AS 3
Hardware: dual-Xeon, 4GB RAM, SCSI OS disks
Security configuration: NT4 domain, NT4 PDC and BDC
This system is being run under RedHat Cluster
OK, I´ll try that ... If it doesn´t work, how could we increase the number
of client connections accepted by winbind?
Thanks again,
Carlos.
2006/6/16, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:22:52PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> What could we do to solve the winbind p
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:22:52PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> What could we do to solve the winbind problem, as stated in
> /var/log/messages?
>
> winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
H. My proposal was exactly in that direction. Each ntlm
helper opens a w
What could we do to solve the winbind problem, as stated in
/var/log/messages?
winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
Regards,
Carlos.
2006/6/16, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:05:17PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> auth_param nt
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:05:17PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=
> squid-2.5-ntlmssp
> auth_param ntlm children 60
60 children don't help at all here, winbind for ntlm
authentication is fully serialized. So in theory one child
should
Le ven 16/06/2006 à 17:42, rich a écrit :
> Pierre MARC wrote:
> > Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit :
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from
> >> my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I
> >> never had to ru
Hi !!
Thanks for answering !!
Our Squid configuration, regarding ntlm, is the following:
auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=
squid-2.5-ntlmssp
auth_param ntlm children 60
auth_param ntlm max_challenge_reuses 100
auth_param ntlm max_challenge_lifetime 20 minutes
auth_pa
Pierre MARC wrote:
Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit :
Hi,
I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from
my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I
never had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the
authentication from /etc/passwd
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi Andrea,
Thanks for your anwer, but I don't think that is the same problem.
In my case, there isn't any firewall between the samba pdc and the
windows clients.
I suppose some mismatch between the sockets calls from samba and
solaris...
But as I'm not a programmer, it's very difficult to me to ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> You could open a bug report. Is that a linux 2.2 kernel ?
>>
>
> It is linux 2.2.13. How do I open a bug report?
Go to https://bugzilla.samba.org/ and follow the link to "New"
cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Hi Pierre,
I don't know about the 'set socket option' issue, but the broken pipe,
write failure and client locking all look familiar to me. I posted a
message about them a couple of days ago. In my case, it was a problem
with my firewall settings - in particular, using the 'established'
option o
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Everything I can find about using the ldapsam
> backend seems to imply that samba will be used
> as a domain controller. Is it possible to use
> ldapsam as the backend and have just a us
Hi !!
I have already sent this message to the list, but, as I have not
received
any replies, I am trying again !!
I have Samba 3.0.22 running as PDC on solaris10.
Each time a windows client (XP SP2 or W2003) opens an explorer to access
a share, I see in the log.smbd :
[2006/06/15 01:28:08, 0]
Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit :
> Hi,
> I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my
> previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never
> had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from
> /etc/passwd. ie when I ad
>
>You could open a bug report. Is that a linux 2.2 kernel ?
>
It is linux 2.2.13. How do I open a bug report?
>
>
>
>cheers, jerry
>=
>Samba--- http://www.samba.org
>Centeris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to build samba 3.0.22 on an older Slackware system.
>
> gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
>
> The error I'm getting is
>
> smbd/statvfs.c: In function `linux_statvfs': smbd/statvfs
Hi,
I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my
previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never
had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from
/etc/passwd. ie when I added someone as a user with useradd they would
autom
I am trying to build samba 3.0.22 on an older Slackware system.
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
The error I'm getting is
smbd/statvfs.c: In function `linux_statvfs': smbd/statvfs.c:40:
incompatible types in assignment
Anyone have any clues?
--
To unsubscribe f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benoit Callebaut wrote:
> Hello,
> I have set up a samba server 3.1.2.
> I want to run it as a PDC.
> Final target is to use it with LDAP and Kerberos.
You should be using the production releases here. Trunk
(a.k.a v3.1.x) is for experiments and on g
Jorge,
Sorry, but nothing seems apparently obvious to me... I would really try
making sure that smbldap-tools has all the proper information in its
configuration files. I'm short on time, but I hope I helped at least a
little bit.
Best,
Ryan
IT wrote:
ryan i see and review my configuratio
Hi,
I am discovering several error messages from one of our samba servers.
Logcheck says:
Security Events
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
getpeername failed. Error was Tra
Jeremy Allison a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Cedric Delfosse wrote:
(Samba 3.0.21c / kernel 2.4.27 / Debian Sarge)
Hello,
One of my user open a file (located on a SAMBA server) in its
application, and when he tries to save it, he gets a "share violation"
error. (other p
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:28:18 -0700
Doug VanLeuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis Rodrigues wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have an Lacie NAS disk attached to an Gigabit network. Since it only
> > exports samba I mounted on one
> > of my gigabit Linux boxes with
> > smbmount //lacie/terabyte /TE
Nop, no syslog entry.
Is it even possible to share smb/cifs mounted filesystems with nfs?
Luis
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:33:22 +1000
Adam Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mount: B:/TERABYTE failed, reason given by server: Permission denied
> > Any ideas?
>
> What does syslog say? NFS will
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:10:12AM +0200, Manuel Erber wrote:
I have a problem with samba Version 3.0.22.
Samba auth against LDAP. It takes up to 5 houres , till samba change the
groupmembership.
In the groups are up to 600 members.
Is that a problem?
Cache samba the
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:10:12AM +0200, Manuel Erber wrote:
> I have a problem with samba Version 3.0.22.
> Samba auth against LDAP. It takes up to 5 houres , till samba change the
> groupmembership.
> In the groups are up to 600 members.
> Is that a problem?
> Cache samba the groupmembership?
I have a problem with samba Version 3.0.22.
Samba auth against LDAP. It takes up to 5 houres , till samba change the
groupmembership.
In the groups are up to 600 members.
Is that a problem?
Cache samba the groupmembership?
Thanks
--
Manuel Erber
Fachinformatiker/Systemintegration
Hospital of
Andrea Battaglia wrote:
Do you have 'force user=' specified in your [disco5] share?
No
Does that user still exist, or did someone delete him recently?
The unique parameters that it has disco5 it's;
[disco5]
comment = Home Directory
path = /path/to/disco5/%U
writable = yes
create mask =
33 matches
Mail list logo
