Hi All
Every now and then--coinciding, I expect, with a share or volume restore of
the server--all the files and folders in MySpace change to the current date.
Thus, while the file may have been created in 1998, last modified on
November 20th, 2004, it will show up as today's date. This is true
Hi Cary Dale:
I know what you meant. But that isn't the thing I want. I don't need any
sync from windows passwd to unix password.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:20:33AM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
There are 2 things you need to make this work:
1)a passwd chat line with the correct values for your
Hello,
got some trouble with nameresolution I think, but need some help because auf
starting blindness now.
Server is resolveable by DNS forward and reverse.
Also I set up a WinS server in samba.
nmblookup -A and smbclient -L servername -N does work
nbtstat -ac does just work with ipaddress
Ok, solved the problem via the Windows Repair Button in network
neighborhood.
G.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sascha Bieler
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:33 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject:
I recently did a similar upgrade, moving from Suse 9.3 to 10.2(the 10.2
was installed on a new machine). I copied over the relevant files
(which for me on Suse where /var/lib/samba, /etc/samba, /etc/passwd,
/etc/group), configured samba on the new box, shutdown the old samba and
started the
Hello folks,
we have a samba 3.0.22 running and it serves our windows and linux
clients with shares for home and group directories.
The group share is set up with a preexec script to check the groups of
the connecting user and create symlinks to the corresponding directories
on the file server.
Hi there,
I'm using an inter-domain trust relationship (DOM-B trusted, DOM-A
trusting, COMP-A=DOM-A computer member).
It works as expected (ish), DOM-B users can logon onto DOM-A
computers.
I'd like to know if it is possible to force login scripts and
ntconfig.pol to be read from the DOM-A pdc
Hi,
I am getting the problem to access shared folder when I am using Dual boot
operating System.
Let say I have two operating system on the same machine.
1) XP and the name of the machine in xp environment is XYZ
2)Cent OS (Linux) and the name of the machine in Linux environment is ABC
both
Brijesh Shukla schrieb:
Hi,
I am getting the problem to access shared folder when I am using Dual boot
operating System.
Let say I have two operating system on the same machine.
1) XP and the name of the machine in xp environment is XYZ
2)Cent OS (Linux) and the name of the machine in Linux
Jens Heidbüchel schrieb:
Brijesh Shukla schrieb:
Hi,
I am getting the problem to access shared folder when I am using Dual
boot
operating System.
Let say I have two operating system on the same machine.
1) XP and the name of the machine in xp environment is XYZ
2)Cent OS (Linux) and the name
On Thursday 29 March 2007, Chris Smith wrote:
On the client:
Set:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Browser\Parameters
IsDomainMaster False
Adding to this. Set both of these under that same tree:
most often I have seen the dueling master browsers because a
windows machine is running with both TCP/IP and NetBEUI
protocol enabled. Browser elections take place on all
protocols enabled. Since Samba does not respond to the NetBEUI
elections the windows machine will win that one no matter what
Changing these registry settings on Windows machines eliminated this
problem for us.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SYSTEM CurrentControlSet Services Browser
Parameters
MaintainServerList = No
IsDomainMaster = FALSE
Eric Knudstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 30 March 2007, Herb Lewis wrote:
most often I have seen the dueling master browsers because a
windows machine is running with both TCP/IP and NetBEUI
protocol enabled.
Interesting observation, and I'll keep that in mind for the future. Although
this wasn't the case on the
Hello,
Adding to my previous msg, debug level 7 finally gave me some output. In
my smbd.log i am seeing the following whenever i try to upload printer
drivers:
getpeername failed. error was transport endpoint is not connected
I've looked in to other methods of doing this, imprints doesn't
Hi All
Our company got a Windows Vista installed laptop even though we ordered
it with XP. Now I'm faced with the task of integrating the beast into
our samba controlled domain. Something I was hoping to delay for some time.
Our PDC is samba 2.2.8a with openldap 2.1.4
We also have a Domain
Hi All
Our company got a Windows Vista installed laptop even though we ordered
it with XP. Now I'm faced with the task of integrating the beast into
our samba controlled domain. Something I was hoping to delay for some time.
Our PDC is samba 2.2.8a with openldap 2.1.4
We also have a Domain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Robinson schrieb:
Hi All
Our company got a Windows Vista installed laptop even though we ordered
it with XP. Now I'm faced with the task of integrating the beast into
our samba controlled domain. Something I was hoping to delay for some
Robert Schetterer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Robinson schrieb:
Hi All
Our company got a Windows Vista installed laptop even though we ordered
it with XP. Now I'm faced with the task of integrating the beast into
our samba controlled domain. Something I was hoping
Hi Samba list,
I have a Linux Samba PDC file server with a separate ldap machine backend.
Every thing works perfect. but the problem is that when I do a command
on the samba server:
# getent group | grep 1033
It gives me:
gname:x:1033:usr1,usr2,usr1,usr2,usr3
Some of the user ids
Dave,
See if either of these two links are able to help you:
http://readlist.com/lists/lists.samba.org/samba/0/1622.html
http://blog.aplpi.com/
Good luck,
Dale
Dave wrote:
Hello,
Adding to my previous msg, debug level 7 finally gave me some
output. In my smbd.log i am seeing the
On Friday 30 March 2007, Dave wrote:
I've looked in to other methods of doing this, imprints doesn't seem to be
supported, cupsaddsmb won't work with vendor supplied drivers, and to date
i haven't been brave enough to try out rpcclient, i'm not sure of the
syntax and have concerns about the
Hi all,
Just finished all of the annoyance issues with IE7 and started putting
together an IE7 policy template for System Policy Editor. This is just
a beta release I guess.
Get it Here:
http://files.pcc-services.com/files/samba/ie7beta1.adm
Here is what I included so far:
- Always Show
Hello,
My thanks to everyone so far who have offered suggestions. I have made a
second print queue in cups, this time a raw queue, ensured that the samba
user who is adding the drivers from the windows box has the permissions to
do so, and tried using the apw to again add drivers. This time
Brijesh Shukla wrote:
Hi,
I am getting the problem to access shared folder when I am using Dual boot
operating System.
Let say I have two operating system on the same machine.
1) XP and the name of the machine in xp environment is XYZ
2)Cent OS (Linux) and the name of the machine in Linux
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:29:08PM +0100, Marc Rechté wrote:
Hi,
I am facing a similar problem to what I faced sometime ago with Excel 11
when saving a modified xls file on a smb share: the application was
saying the file is already used by another user (although this was not
the case).
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
So I think it would be much better to use the vuid as enc-ctx,
but check for each call to a specific tid that the call was encrypted
or not. And maybe also allow plain requests with the vuid, or force the
client to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
I agree that the trans2 stuff is ugly, but at least it is in an already
reserved space in the protocol. Whatever we do, we should continue to
allow a re-key modal (despite the issues it then has with credentials
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:43:11AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
We could also create a new call at SMB level maybe SMBsesssetup2?
There're a lot of free message numbers. Are there also some ranges
defined? Or were the number randomly picked by the first implementor of
a call?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher schrieb:
So I think it would be much better to use the vuid as enc-ctx,
but check for each call to a specific tid that the call was encrypted
or not. And maybe also allow plain requests with the vuid, or force the
client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:43:11AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
We could also create a new call at SMB level maybe SMBsesssetup2?
There're a lot of free message numbers. Are there also some ranges
defined? Or
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
So I think it would be much better to use the vuid as enc-ctx,
but check for each call to a specific tid that the call was encrypted
or not. And maybe also allow plain requests with the vuid, or force the
client to
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:43:11AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
We could also create a new call at SMB level maybe SMBsesssetup2?
There're a lot of free message numbers. Are there also some ranges
defined? Or were the number randomly picked by the first implementor of
a call?
A
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:32:16PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Then I'd say it should be a trans2 call on the IPC$ share.
Yep, that's what we decided on.
Is that trans2 call a replacement for the session setup?
or is it just an 'switch on encryption for the next request'
on the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:36:11AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
A lesson in SMB politics. The top level numbers are defined by
Microsoft who reserve the right to allocate new ones at any
time and for any reason. The space *we* have reserved to allocate
from is the trans2 space defined in the
At http://samba.sernet.de/ma/bzr/SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr/
revno: 5313
revision-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committer: Michael Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
branch nick: SAMBA_3_0-registry.bzr
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-30 22:19:51 + (Fri, 30 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 22013
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22013
Log:
Move to SSPI framing (sig first in NTLM).
Jeremy
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/smb_seal.c
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-30 22:25:08 + (Fri, 30 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 22014
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22014
Log:
Make us pass RANDOMIPC test again :-(. This is an ugly check-in,
but I've no option.
Jeremy.
Modified:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-30 22:35:35 + (Fri, 30 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 22015
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22015
Log:
Fix for memory leak from Steven Danneman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy.
Modified:
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-30 23:23:45 + (Fri, 30 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 22016
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22016
Log:
Try and fix the build - move things out of proto.h
Jeremy.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/smb_seal.c
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2007-03-30
00:00:29.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2007-03-31 00:00:25.0
+
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-Build status as of Fri Mar 30 00:00:02 2007
+Build status as of Sat Mar
Author: jra
Date: 2007-03-31 01:14:00 + (Sat, 31 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 22017
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22017
Log:
After changing 2000 lines of this I think this is needed :-).
Jeremy.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/lanman.c
Author: herb
Date: 2007-03-31 03:11:02 + (Sat, 31 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 22018
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=22018
Log:
fix compile error
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/nmbd/nmbd_incomingdgrams.c
43 matches
Mail list logo
