Any help would be greatly appreciated as this server is a production server
and users keep sending requests that their passwds don't work and I have
re-set their passwords almost on a daily basis.
Thank you !!
Chris
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus sig
Any help would be greatly appreciated as this server is a production server
and users keep sending requests that their passwds don't work and I have
re-set their passwords almost on a daily basis.
Thank you !!
Chris
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus sig
Wayne Hammond wrote:
I have a few OpenSuse Samba Servers. They are all stand alone File
Servers.
All the Clients are Windows XP.
The Server and Clients are set up as a Workgroup.
Usually no more than 15 Clients.
The Samba Server is setup as the Master Browser, but as I
read more about suggested
Sorry - I think
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\Netlogon\Parameters
RequireStrongKey=0
is currently required (at least with Samba 3.3.4). The client will
successfully join the domain without this key, but attempting to log in
with a domain account (after a reboot) will give
Hi all,
Our company is looking at moving premises some time next year, the plan
at the moment is to have a new server room with all new servers set up
at the new building prior to moving the workstations over. I'm wondering
if anyone has done anything like this and what the best way to proceed
Correction to this post as the second DWORD should have been
DNSNameResolutionRequired.
However, I'm interested to know why the error message we receive occurs
- it seems to me that setting DNSNameResolutionRequired to 0 should also
prevent Windows 7 attempting to set its DNS name after the domain
Hi Volker,
We can confirm that only the first two keys (i.e.
DomainCompatibilityMode & DomainCompatibilityMode) are required in order
for Samba 3.3.4 & Windows 7 RC to domain join and interoperate.
Immediately after a domain join, we have observed the following message
from the Windows 7 client (
Hi
I'm trying to get a setup working with 2 separate AD forests (both 2003 R2
based). Let's call them PROD.x.ch and DEV.x.ch. There is a one way cross
forest trust from DEV to PROD (hope I said this the right way), so that
authenticated principals in PROD can access resources from DEV.
The set
Vijay Thakur belongs to Skoost and sent you a little gift.
Click below to collect your gift:
http://www.skoost.com/fun?samba%40lists%2Esamba%2Eorg/16001899/10
P.S. This is a safe and innocent gift that Vijay Thakur
sent from Skoost, the free goodies website.
This e-mail was sent to samba@lists.s
John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Maxime V wrote:
>> Thanks for help, yes i moved them too. In fact i moved all /etc/samba/*
>>
>
> But the tdb files should not be in /etc/samba should they?
>
> John
On most systems secrets.tdb and schannel_store.tdb are located in
/etc/sa
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, John,
>
> Du meintest am 13.05.09:
>
>>> Thanks for help, yes i moved them too. In fact i moved all
>>> /etc/samba/*
>
>> But the tdb files should not be in /etc/samba should they?
>
> Here (Slackware):
> "/etc/samba/smb.conf" sets the
Hallo, John,
Du meintest am 13.05.09:
>> Thanks for help, yes i moved them too. In fact i moved all
>> /etc/samba/*
> But the tdb files should not be in /etc/samba should they?
Here (Slackware):
"/etc/samba/smb.conf" sets the directory for the *.tdb files
lock directory = /var/lock/sam
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Maxime V wrote:
>
> Thanks for help, yes i moved them too. In fact i moved all /etc/samba/*
>
But the tdb files should not be in /etc/samba should they?
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba
I have a few OpenSuse Samba Servers. They are all stand alone File Servers.
All the Clients are Windows XP.
The Server and Clients are set up as a Workgroup.
Usually no more than 15 Clients.
The Samba Server is setup as the Master Browser, but as I
read more about suggested options it becomes a l
Not 100 percent sure. Is there a way to determine whether our current
libnss_winbind is thread-safe ? If not, is there a way to make it .
Thanks for the reply.
-Original Message-
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:12 AM
To: C
Hi,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:37:07PM -0400, mrosa...@eastgranby.k12.ct.us wrote:
> Last month, I updated to Fedora 10 with samba 3.2.11-0.30.fc10 via a
> complete reinstall. Using x86-64. We are now experiencing a problem on a
> share with the force user parameter.
>
> [zz]
> comment =
Karl Koch wrote:
hello,
i use samba with acl bound into a w2k3 ads domain.
i have set the option inherit acls = yes and when i change a acl on a
folder the new folders i create have the same acls.
But when i change the acl on a folder the subdirectorys of this folder
wont update automatic like
dear friends,
I am faced with the following problem:
I have a Domain created in Samba 3.0.28a (Ubuntu Server 8.04) where there are 4
PCs. 2 of them are operating absolutely fine.
the other 2 however when they loggon the server with their username/passwd
credentials are prompted with a message
18 matches
Mail list logo