[Samba] net ads join error message "Failed to join domain: failed to connect to AD: Client not found in Kerberos database"

2012-05-01 Thread kartheek katakam
hello, I have a wiered issue, some time when I run net ads join -U , some times I have see this error message, and some time it shows as success. In between the error messages and success result, their are no changes to any configuration, not sure what is causing this issue. # net ads join -U 504

[Samba] samba with pacemaker in AD environment

2012-05-01 Thread Seth Galitzer
Greetings, I'm trying to configure samba in a pacemaker two-node (active/passive) cluster. I am able to fail the services over from one node to another, but when I do, I still need to run "net ads join" on the node before client users can connect to a share. In my smb.conf I am specifying t

[Samba] NEW: Samba4 Project Status Wiki

2012-05-01 Thread Charles Tryon
(Posted to Samba-technical, but probably should have cross posted here for people interested in Samba4...) I have created a Samba4 Project Status Wiki page at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Status. Actually, the "Status" page was already there, but hadn't been updated since about 2008.

Re: [Samba] upgrade

2012-05-01 Thread Michael Wood
Hi On 1 May 2012 00:24, wrote: > Hello list, Iam running every day git pull for update my samba-master, > after I follow the step upgrading-samba4, and everything is ok, but I will > want know how I can see if my samba4 is upgrade succeful. thereis some > log. some aplication that say me it, in

Re: [Samba] Bringing up interface causes smbd to become unresponsive on that subnet

2012-05-01 Thread Tony Markel
>From a windows client I get "network path not found" as soon interface is brought up, by either host name or ip address, but only on computers on the same subnet as that interface. The log (finally) tells a story I can't find a solution to: May 1 06:16:41 nt-filer01 smbd[15036]: [2012/05/01 06:

Re: [Samba] Samba4 with Posix ACL's

2012-05-01 Thread Ben Metcalfe
There's a thread here: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/170 (I'm posting as *fireappleblack )* ...Which implies that the hold-up (from a zfs-linux perspective) is the lack of richacls support in the mainstream kernel at the moment. (E.g. OpenSuse supports