[Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

2007-05-21 Thread Jean-Jacques Moulis
By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory! We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. with the following configuration security = DOMAIN password server = PDC encrypt passwords = yes map

Re: [Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

2007-05-21 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Jacques Moulis wrote: > By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be > mandatory! > > We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. > > with the following configuration > > se

Re: [Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

2007-05-22 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Jacques Moulis wrote: > GC> > Since upgrading to 3.0.25 and regressing to > GC> > 3.0.24-gc-1 some users couldn't > GC> > print (strange considering map to guest = Bad Password) > GC> > > GC> > they got an NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL in log files an

Re[2]: [Samba] Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1

2007-05-22 Thread Jean-Jacques Moulis
On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:31:57 -0500 "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GC> Jean-Jacques Moulis wrote: GC> > By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory! GC> > GC> > We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. GC