> It appears that
> you have users stored in one OU and Computers stored in another OU. I
> don't believe this is supported right now. (I believe this is because
> PAM will only search one OU for a UNIX user instead of multiples.)
> >>>NSS will only search one OU for account type
> >>It appears that
> >>you have users stored in one OU and Computers stored in another OU. I
> >>don't believe this is supported right now. (I believe this is because
> >>PAM will only search one OU for a UNIX user instead of multiples.)
> >NSS will only search one OU for account type objects;
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
It appears that
you have users stored in one OU and Computers stored in another OU. I
don't believe this is supported right now. (I believe this is because
PAM will only search one OU for a UNIX user instead of multiples.)
NSS will only search one OU for acco
Adam Tauno Williams írta:
Also, the Machines and Users must be stored in the same OU.
Beneath a common OU, storing IN the same OU is not required.
It appears that
you have users stored in one OU and Computers stored in another OU. I
don't believe this is supported right now. (I believe
It appears that
you have users stored in one OU and Computers stored in another OU. I
don't believe this is supported right now. (I believe this is because
PAM will only search one OU for a UNIX user instead of multiples.)
NSS will only search one OU for account type objects; and both mach
> Also, the Machines and Users must be stored in the same OU.
Beneath a common OU, storing IN the same OU is not required.
> It appears that
> you have users stored in one OU and Computers stored in another OU. I
> don't believe this is supported right now. (I believe this is because
> PAM
> ldap passwd sync = Yes
> ldap delete dn = yes
> ldap suffix = dc=ZahidTractor,dc=com
> ldap user suffix = dc=zahidtractor,dc=com
> ldap group suffix = dc=zahidtractor,dc=com
> ldap group suffix = dc=zahidtractor,dc=com
> ldap machine suffix
