simo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 3.0.22.
>>
>> Sorry, obviously that should have been part of my original post! :-)
>
> Any chance you can try with 3.0.24 and report a bug in bugzilla if it is
> still the case?
Tested today - bug still exists in 3.0.24 compiled from official samba
sources.
h
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:56 +0100, Erik Forsberg wrote:
> simo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> When new user or group objects are added to the idmap database, the
> >> values from the sambaUnixIdPool object will be used. This means that
> >> if uidNumber on the sambaUnixIdPool is set to 1,
simo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When new user or group objects are added to the idmap database, the
>> values from the sambaUnixIdPool object will be used. This means that
>> if uidNumber on the sambaUnixIdPool is set to 1, and there is
>> already a SID<->uidNumber mapping using uidNumber
