Re: [Samba] Using the same LDAP entry for posixAccount and sambaSamAccount with smbldap

2004-02-19 Thread Jérôme Tournier
Le Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:30:24PM +0100, Carlos García Recio a ecrit: > ldap filter = (&(uid=%u)(objectclass=sambaSamAccount)) Can you try removing the filter (or comment it) ? It seem to cause some problem. I did not search the exact problem, bust there must certainly be a good way of writing the

Re: [Samba] Using the same LDAP entry for posixAccount and sambaSamAccount with smbldap

2004-02-19 Thread Carlos García Recio
Here we go again! El Jueves 19 Febrero 2004 12:59, Carlos García Recio escribió: > Here we go! > > El Jueves 19 Febrero 2004 12:39, Jérôme Tournier escribió: > > Le Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:07:49PM +0100, Carlos García Recio a ecrit: > > > samba 3.0.2 > > > smbldap-tools 0.8.4 > > > RH 9 > > > nss_

Re: [Samba] Using the same LDAP entry for posixAccount and sambaSamAccount with smbldap

2004-02-19 Thread Carlos García Recio
Here we go! El Jueves 19 Febrero 2004 12:39, Jérôme Tournier escribió: > Le Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:07:49PM +0100, Carlos García Recio a ecrit: > > samba 3.0.2 > > smbldap-tools 0.8.4 > > RH 9 > > nss_ldap configured > > pam_ldap NOT configured > > LDAP passwd backend > > winxp pro domain member >

Re: [Samba] Using the same LDAP entry for posixAccount and sambaSamAccount with smbldap

2004-02-19 Thread Jérôme Tournier
Le Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:07:49PM +0100, Carlos García Recio a ecrit: > samba 3.0.2 > smbldap-tools 0.8.4 > RH 9 > nss_ldap configured > pam_ldap NOT configured > LDAP passwd backend > winxp pro domain member Can you also send us your smbldap-tools configuration files, and also samba and openldap

[Samba] Using the same LDAP entry for posixAccount and sambaSamAccount with smbldap

2004-02-19 Thread Carlos García Recio
samba 3.0.2 smbldap-tools 0.8.4 RH 9 nss_ldap configured pam_ldap NOT configured LDAP passwd backend winxp pro domain member Hello, i've configured smbldap-tools in smb.conf to manage users from usrmgr.exe. It works at group creation but have a strange behavior in user creation. In the LDAP the