Re: [Samba] testparm output vs documentation

2008-11-09 Thread Miguel Medalha
The parameters output by "testparm -v" are *349*, not 348 as I previously said. Sorry! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] testparm output vs documentation

2008-11-09 Thread Miguel Medalha
When I run testparm -v (note the -v parameter), I get the output of 348 parameters, including defaults and parameters which have no default. And that's how it should be. In this way, I can see my own settings, the settings that are in use by default even if I did not set them, and possible para

Re: [Samba] testparm output vs documentation

2008-11-09 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Sunday November 9 2008 08:00:25 FC Mario Patty wrote: > Maybe the reason behind "testparm not showing them up" because they are all > come with default values. For example I set parameter "security = user". OP ran testparm with -v Regards, Norberto -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the

Re: [Samba] testparm output vs documentation

2008-11-09 Thread FC Mario Patty
Maybe the reason behind "testparm not showing them up" because they are all come with default values. For example I set parameter "security = user". When I ran the testparm command, it didn't show up. Try to change it to "share" and see if it'd make any difference. But of course the developer may a

[Samba] testparm output vs documentation

2008-11-08 Thread Miguel Medalha
Hello dear Samba developers I am now configuring a PDC for a small LAN, using Samba 3.0.32 from Sernet. While the work advances I am studying Samba. I am not very experienced -- in fact I would better be called a beginner with Samba -- so please forgive me for any obvious errors with my observ