On 11/9/2007, Diego Alejandro Cheda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
profile acls = Yes
map acl inherit = Yes
hide unreadable = Yes
map hidden = Yes
Do you really have these in the Global section?
1. The 'Yes' is supposed to be 'yes' - but don't know if 'case' is a
problem with thes
Hi Charles! Thanks for your ideas!
I read this post http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-July/133723.html and
found some similarities with the behavior of my configuration. For example,
sometimes a user can delete files or directories with "r-x" permissions. Then,
I upgrade to samba 3.0
On 11/8/2007, Diego Alejandro Cheda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a problem with the "hide unreadable = yes" option. In windows
xp professional sp2 with explorer, or ssh or smbclient, either
directories and files does not hide.
Do you have 'Tools > Folder options > View > Show hidden file
On 21.04-09:18, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote:
> > The problem only showed up when I mounted the share
> > with username/password. When using domain\username/password
> > everything runs as expected.
>
> Do you also have local users on the clients? Perhaps it is using the local
> SIDs instead of the
On Thursday 21 April 2005 09:04 am, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
> No, no ACLs.
>
> But I managed to solve this problem by accident, though I
> don't really understand why in detail.
>
> The problem only showed up when I mounted the share
> with username/password. When using domain\username/password
>
On 21.04-08:10, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> | We have a Samba 3.0.11 Fileserver running on Solaris and
> | joined to an Active Directory.
> |
> | I have shares, with many directories, and I want to
> | hide the directories, people are not allowed to access
> | anyway. So I engaged the "hide unre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Kaegi wrote:
| Hello
|
| We have a Samba 3.0.11 Fileserver running on Solaris and
| joined to an Active Directory.
|
| I have shares, with many directories, and I want to
| hide the directories, people are not allowed to access
| anyway. So I
I didn't get a reply on this. Can anybody explain, why there's
a difference in what samba considers a "readable file"
when users are logged on to the domain or not?
In case this is written up somewhere:
A link to relevant docs would be very helpful.
Thanks alot
Chris
On 15.04-13:45, Christoph
