> Debug level 10 logs are needed at this point to see what
> the smbd is seeing when looking at the CIFS mounted files.
Here is level 10 log of log.smbd that is generated when I experience the
problem first described.
[2010/07/09 12:48:25, 10] smbd/open.c:3365(create_file_default)
create_file
y, July 07, 2010 7:50 PM
To: Robert Heller
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; ltracc...@alexanderconsultants.net
Subject: Re: [Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
>
> SNIP
>>
>>
>>>
>>> This is truly a bad idea. That XP share should be
>>>
SNIP
This is truly a bad idea. That XP share should be
mounted by the workstations just like the server
shares. Move the data to the server, or use the XP box
as a server to directly serve those who need the data
on it.
Cheers,
TMS III
Why is this a bad idea? We've been running thi
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 7 July 2010 19:19, Leandro Tracchia
> wrote:
> [...]
>> The problem with simply moving the files over to the Ubuntu server is that
>> the files on the XP box are stored on a RAID array that comes with a
>> controller card whose driver is re
On 7 July 2010 19:19, Leandro Tracchia
wrote:
[...]
> The problem with simply moving the files over to the Ubuntu server is that
> the files on the XP box are stored on a RAID array that comes with a
> controller card whose driver is really only designed to be run on Windows,
> not Linux.
[...]
B
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:48:35PM -0400, Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've
> starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade.
>
> When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across
> folders t
Is this a *real* RAID controller or a 'fake' (BIOS/Software/MB) RAID
controller? If it is a real controller are you sure there is no Linux
driver for it? (Esp. since you are using Ubuntu!) If it is a
software/BIOS/MB RAID controller the performance is going to be really
bad -- these controllers
Hallo, Leandro,
Du meintest am 07.07.10:
> The problem with simply moving the files over to the
> Ubuntu server is that the files on the XP box are
> stored on a RAID array that comes with a controller
> card whose driver is really only designed to be run on
> Windows, not Linux.
Sorry - where i
At Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:19:43 -0400 ltracc...@alexanderconsultants.net wrote:
>
> > This is truly a bad idea. That XP share should be
> > mounted by the workstations just like the server
> > shares. Move the data to the server, or use the XP box
> > as a server to directly serve those who need the
This is truly a bad idea. That XP share should be
mounted by the workstations just like the server
shares. Move the data to the server, or use the XP box
as a server to directly serve those who need the data
on it.
Cheers,
TMS III
Why is this a bad idea? We've been running this setup
for a f
I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and
we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade.
When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run
across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the
user to click th
11 matches
Mail list logo
