On 08/ 4/10 10:35 PM, David Magda wrote:
On Wed, August 4, 2010 10:33, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
the ngroup_max issue isn't specific to an active directory
environment.I found with samba 3.0.x, if you were in more than 16
groups, you might not have all the access you thought you should but
Solaris 10 includes samba 3.0.x with zfs support. Sun backported zfs
modules from newer sun releases.If you were to download samba from
www.samba.org you would have to go with 3.4 or 3.5 for the zfs module.
In the short term, assuming you don't have Vista or Windows 7 clients
and
Hi!
You also can run into problems if you have AD environment (workgroup
mode could be affected as well btw) and users who are members of more
than 16 groups and are using ZFS acls. Faced this problem and could not
solve even by compiling samba 3.5.4, adding ngroups_max=1024 in
/etc/system
the ngroup_max issue isn't specific to an active directory
environment.I found with samba 3.0.x, if you were in more than 16
groups, you might not have all the access you thought you should but you
could still logon. (samba didn't check the system ngroups_max.) With
samba 3.5.x if you
On Wed, August 4, 2010 10:33, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
the ngroup_max issue isn't specific to an active directory
environment.I found with samba 3.0.x, if you were in more than 16
groups, you might not have all the access you thought you should but you
could still logon. (samba didn't check
On Wed, August 4, 2010 09:44, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I did have some issues when switching from UFS to ZFS. ZFS ACL model is
a lot more in line with Windows than UFS ACL's were. With UFS, it
looked like potential mismatches between Windows and UFS acl's were
ignored.
ZFS model = NFSv4
