Samba 2.2.X, PAM and Kerberos5

Hi, I am trying to put together the latest samba 2.2 from CVS, PAM and Kerberos5 on a Solaris8 platform. Although it does compile fine, attempting to make it work through pam_krb5 fails miserably. I have configured the /etc/pam.conf to read: # Samba Auth samba auth

sessionid.tdb Corruption

Hi, I just experienced tdb corruption with sessionid.tdb running samba 2.2.2 on Solaris 8 with the result that no new connections were being allowed. I renamed the corrupt file, samba automatically created a fresh one and now it all seems to be functioning correctly. I apologise if this has

Re: VFS error - turns out to be vps_ops.rename failure .. help

On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:32:44AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: AB, This is already fixed in SAMBA_2_2, correct? Can you verify? This code has already been changed. I've talked about HEAD. I'll look into SAMBA_2_2 later this week but it seems to be OK. -- / Alexander Bokovoy Software

Re: Question for someone

Bonomo, Mike wrote: Hello all: Our Corporate office does not want us to run unsupported software. We do like and want to use Samba, so the question is: Is there a company that can provide support contracts for Samba running on Suns boxes? Some of the companies in

Re: compile issue on openbsd 2.9

On Tue, 14 May 2002, David Bear wrote: solved by changing DYNEXP in make file to -Bdynamic or something like that. see the ld man page for openbsd for details... at least its still compiling and linking;-) Thanks. I'll get this cleaned up later today hopefully. That value was actually in

Re: Samba 2.2.X, PAM and Kerberos5

On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 10:23, Steve Langasek wrote: I'm not sure why the 'appdata_ptr == NULL' check is there, but I seem to remember that it's true that Solaris does not honor the appdata_ptr field. If Samba now depends on sane handling of appdata_ptr, then it's likely that this won't work

Re: SMB Keep-alive.

Richard Sharpe wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2002, Christopher R.Hertel wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:07:07AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:10:00PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: I have not seen SMB Keep-Alive used except in a few odd instances in

Re: SMB Keep-alive.

Christopher R. Hertel wrote: I have not seen SMB Keep-Alive used except in a few odd instances in which it is used to trick Windows into behaving properly. Does anyone know if SMB Keep-Alive is actually used in practice? Samba optionally sends it to see if the client has crashed,

Re: SMB Keep-alive.

David Collier-Brown wrote: : Samba optionally sends it to see if the client has crashed, and can clean up if so. Just checking the docs, it appears we have this turned on by default and set to 300 seconds. Chris -)- -- Christopher R. Hertel -)-

Fix warnings from Solaris Compiles of CVS 2_2

Here's the changes required to elimenate all of the compiler's warnings issued while compiling CVS 2_2 with cc: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C 5.0 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8. Most of them seem reasonable; though someone might want to take a closer look. The changes don't apparently affect

Re: Samba 2.2.X, PAM and Kerberos5

Steve Langasek wrote: [...] As far as it goes, your above configuration looks correct. Have you checked wherever your syslog auth facility logs to, to see if pam_krb5 is logging any information that might be useful? Hmm, although it seems it supports the debug switch, the module seems