Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> Attached is a patch against HEAD that provides the 'P' option for
> acctFlags.
Can you please verify that this is the correct bit to set? Rember, MS
defines them - so we should check. Ethereal should be able to show you.
> I havent been able to test this yet, so use
Attached is a patch against HEAD that provides the 'P' option for
acctFlags.
I havent been able to test this yet, so use with care.
Ideally, this would eventually set the "user cannot change password" bit
to the client, but as Andrew mentioned, this hasnt been fully implemented,
and I'm not c
David Collier-Brown wrote:
>
> These are for param/loadparm.c and utils/testparm.c, respectively,
> to put in the self-checking that's been languishing...
My comments apply to HEAD, btw - which branch was the patch intended
for?
> After these go in, I'll start tracking smb.conf changes
> again,
>The SNIA doc says similar things about DOS LM1.2X002 vs. LM1.2X002 and DOS
>LANMAN2.1 vs. LANMAN2.1, particularly that with the DOS dialects the OS/2
>codes had to be mapped to DOS codes. So if the OS/2 codes are a
>superset... It would be interesting to see the mappings.
Chris,
The OS/2 Erro
I think I've got this figured, but someone let me know if'n I've got it
sidewards.
The server sends its Capabilities data in the NegProt respoinse, and then
the client replies with its Capabilities in the SESSION_SETUP_ANDX. The
two values are ANDed... and the result is the agreed upon behavi
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:01:34PM -0500, Steven French wrote:
> OS/2 had 16 bit errors - basically the ERRdos range (SMB error class) is
> mostly error codes introduced in OS/2 development and could be just as
> easily named "ERRos2"
The old X/Open doc says (in its description of availabel diale
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 06:23:38AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Nope. There's a challenge sent by either the server and then the client
> > produces a LM and NT response which is a hash of the challenge and the
> > user's password. This is sent to the server (in this case winbindd) for
>
>Possibly that Linux allows a user to be in a max of 32 groups?
Yes, this is the limit. Look in your kernel source at include/asm/param.h
for NGROUPS.
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minuteman Drive
Scarborough, ME 04074
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> It's actually NTLMSSP base-64 encoded in http headers.
>
> > There has been much discussion about this on this list and on
> > #samba-technical and it may already be possible or close t
>> Is there, was there ever such a limith ?
>> I was called by an larger ISP here.
>>
>> "Samba server Unix only handles 32 security groups" he claimed.
>>
>> Anyone sheer some lights ?
>
>Possibly that Linux allows a user to be in a max of 32 groups?
>
>Do you have more info?
I've got a customer
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:21:47AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
> > > We have to node status to get the *name* of the PDC, becouse the
> > > NETLOGON RPC requires that. Windows machines to a NETLOGON Mailslot
> > > message, but we don't do that at present.
> >
> > So you join the domain withou
Hi all,
First off, apologies if this is the wrong forum or the
message is a repeat.
I have Samba set up to join a realm. Most of the time, my
Win2k client gets authenticated as follows:
1.
Client sends NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE
2.
Samba sends back NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:44:24PM +0200, Johann Hanne wrote:
> Short version:
> --
> Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
> to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
> NTLM-authentication?
Yes, there are such hooks. You can look a
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Short version:
> > --
> > Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
> > to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
> > NTLM-authentication?
> > Long version:
> > --
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > The whole thing is based on the authentication used by any SMB client that
> > connects to a SMB server:
> > - The client connects to the server
> > - The server generates and sends some random bytes (challenge)
> > - The client
These are for param/loadparm.c and utils/testparm.c, respectively,
to put in the self-checking that's been languishing...
After these go in, I'll start tracking smb.conf changes
again, so I can support them, any you can delete
samba-patches 298 (Self-check patches for 2.2.0 alpha 3,
11 Apr 2001
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Johann Hanne wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Short version:
> --
> Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
> to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
> NTLM-authentication?
>
> Long version:
> -
> Intern
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Ulf Bertilsson wrote:
> Is there, was there ever such a limith ?
> I was called by an larger ISP here.
>
> "Samba server Unix only handles 32 security groups" he claimed.
>
> Anyone sheer some lights ?
Possibly that Linux allows a user to be in a max of 32 groups?
Do you
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:44:54AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote:
> >
> > > Anyway, if the unexpected.tdb is the reason that winbindd needs nmbd, then
> > > I think it could be made optional. I imagine that wi
Hi folks,
Short version:
--
Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
NTLM-authentication?
Long version:
-
Internet Explorer can authenticate against a Web-Server using the
so-ca
Hello all,
Anyone knows if there is an easy way to determine the IP address
of a client who is trying to connect unsuccessfully? The client
is providing an invalid login name. The error logs are like these:
[2002/07/12 09:28:18, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(545)
Couldn't find user 'foo' i
Is there, was there ever such a limith ?
I was called by an larger ISP here.
"Samba server Unix only handles 32 security groups" he claimed.
Anyone sheer some lights ?
--
You are not your system specs.
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:14:17 +0530, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Finally it has been working out the box. Now i am able to rsync the data more than
>4GB files as well.
>But during boot time i gets some error message of this kind.
>#
>/lib/ext3.o: unresolved symbol iget4_R7414451b
>/lib/e
Hi,
I have applied some fixed to get rid of warnings, plus it now plays nice
against NetApp, and you can now specify a path to add to all paths that
are sent to the server.
NetApp is the most picky filer I have seen. It demands share names of the
form \\server\share in a TconX, where Windows
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:44:54AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote:
>
> > Anyway, if the unexpected.tdb is the reason that winbindd needs nmbd, then
> > I think it could be made optional. I imagine that winbindd would be
> > sending regular name queries in order to
25 matches
Mail list logo
