On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Poornima Marattil wrote:
> >
> > > hi ppl,
> > > Need some help.
> > > We usually put policy file in the netlogon dir.What if we have 15 to 20
> This is possible, doe you have any problems in that area?
>
> >
> > That is a B
Hej
I got my samba server that is joined to a win2000 ad to talk to win2000
client with gssapi, where the user is from another Kerberos realm the the
ad. The patch below was needed. This requires mit kerberos 1.3 (development
branch, not released yet). The w2000 client seems to use SPNEGO with NT
Here's a quick patch to fix a few error codes in swat - return 500 on a
server error, not 400, and return 403 Forbidden instead of 400 Server
Error when attempting to access swat from a host not allowed by "hosts
allow" or "hosts deny"
Also a quick typo in a comment
Vance Lankhaar
Index: web/cgi
Hi there;
I have Samba-2.2.7a configured as PDC.
I can login from Windows9x, NT, 2K, XP. My problem is with executing
batch file at login time.
My logon. bat is:
net time \\linux /set /yes
net use n: \\linux\netlogon /no
net use h: \\linux\homes /no
net use p: \\linux\public /no
net use t: \\lin
I noticed that on samba 2.x, as root we can do "smbpasswd -a -s user passwd"
without being prompt of anything. This is not working on 3.0a21. I will
need to type in the password twice using the above command. Is this a
feature to not allow passwords to be seen, or a bug that should be fixed?
Thanks Tim: that's good to know.
Also aliguori: you probably want to add "static" in front of
d_print_netlogon...(), so that it won't show up in net_proto.h. if it does,
"make" complains about confliction. I got that doing a clean make.
Chere
On Thursday 27 February 2003 01:56 pm, Tim Potter
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:38:50PM -0800, Chere Zhou wrote:
> This patch works for me. Thanks a lot!
>
> But I do have to manually edit the file, because long lines got wrapped in
> the email.
There's a neat-o program called 'unwrapdiff' that can do all the
hard for for you. Under debian it
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:10:12PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
> > try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
> > fragmented PDU's too well.
>
> Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
> having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace of the
Hi All,
I was able to get 'winbind' configured on my Solaris-9 system and
authenticate Windows domain users, but I have three problems:
Server OS; Solaris 9, MU2
SAmba version: 2.2.7(also tried 2.2.8prel , but same problem)
Tried 'winbind enum users/groups' both true and false
This patch works for me. Thanks a lot!
But I do have to manually edit the file, because long lines got wrapped in
the email.
Chere
On Thursday 27 February 2003 12:20 pm, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Last round of changes to the Samba CLDAP code. Every byte is now
> accounted for in the respons
Last round of changes to the Samba CLDAP code. Every byte is now
accounted for in the response packet so we shouldn't have anymore parsing
errors. It should apply cleanly against HEAD.
Index: source/utils/net_ads_cldap.c
===
RCS f
That's what I thought too. Samba is not linked to any ldap libraries
itself, but something is triggering it to not use nscd. That's why I
mentioned the switch from user to root and back as a possibility. I don't
know enough about nscd under linux to say.
My guess is that this is being done by
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:47:59AM -0800, D Jemms wrote:
>
>
> > Port 445 is
> > Microsoft's direct SMB
> > over TCP (no NetBIOS in the middle) the preferred
> > method for
> > Windows 2000 and XP - should be a cleaner way to
> > work with, but I do not
> > know it well yet...
> According to http
Previously I wrote:
> It appears that name_resolve_bcast() does not find hosts in a workgroup if
> there are only win98 or win95 machines in the workgroup.
The method that's being used for browsing, where a cli_session_request() is
sent to the master browser, does not work if the master browser i
Isn't it up to libc to decide whether or not to use nscd? Or to nscd?
Afaik there is no way that samba can actually _know_ about nscd.
Jelmer
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Andrew Morgan wrote about 'samba not using
nscd (fwd)':
> Reposting for the third time... Please let me know
Serge,
this typically means that you are using a non ANSI compliant c compiler
as teh default on your system. You can check to see if there is a gnu
gcc compiler available for your platform (whatever it is - in the future
you should probably post this kind of thing on the samba list, instead
of s
On February 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
> fragmented PDU's too well.
Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace of the rpcclient
run.
Cheers,
Waid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> mentioned this briefly on samba@ about a week ago, but I've actually
> done some tracking on it now. I'm still digging, but this is a summary
> of what I've found.
>
> symptoms: doing rpcclient
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
I'll take a look. I'm just reaally tied up on a few things at the moment.
I think i'm the one that put that code in. Thanks.
cheers, jerry
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Peter Hurley wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
This is my first time I install Samba software.
How can I resolve the issue with the following error when invoking
./configure on an initial installation.
checking configure summary... WARNING: No automated network interface
determination
ERROR: no seteuid method available
configure: error: summar
I first thought that the libraries were not threaded but it
appears they are. But you have a compile options to disable
threads.
alkonost{pbelang1}-openldap-2.1.4% ./configure --help|grep -i thread
--with-threads with threads [auto]
Don't know what the impacts are but since Samba is non-
Reposting for the third time... Please let me know if there is more or
different information needed, or where I might look to debug this further
myself.
Thanks,
Andy
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:37:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Did you try to compile using OpenLDAP? I think that can
be a "quick" fix.
Otherwise, open a ticket with Sun?
Pierre B.
Jeff Mandel wrote:
trace from 12327:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xfecd9794 in __sigprocmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#1 0xfecce1e8 in _deliversigs () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#2
trace from 12327:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xfecd9794 in __sigprocmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#1 0xfecce1e8 in _deliversigs () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#2 0xfecd05c4 in thr_sigsetmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#3
#4 0xb in ?? ()
#5 0xfecdb1f0 in usleep () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
Michael Steffens wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Mandel wrote:
I found this is office 2000 v 9.3821 SR1 (not the latest)
We are trying to load the latest office update to see if that fixes
it first. Is anybody experiencing this with samba later than 9.4402
SR1 or on the latest version, whatever that is?
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Poornima Marattil wrote:
>
> > hi ppl,
> > Need some help.
> > We usually put policy file in the netlogon dir.What if we have 15 to 20
This is possible, doe you have any problems in that area?
>
> That is a BAD place to put them! Profiles should preferably go into a
> s
> Port 445 is
> Microsoft's direct SMB
> over TCP (no NetBIOS in the middle) the preferred
> method for
> Windows 2000 and XP - should be a cleaner way to
> work with, but I do not
> know it well yet...
According to http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=204279
if I disable NetBios over TCP/IP on win
27 matches
Mail list logo
