From: Kai Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002
10:21 PM
So now back to the structure of the handles. As mentioned before, I don't
think it has actually been decided upon (but perhaps I'm just not aware of
it). All opinions with reasons are therefore very welcome.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:09 AM
Kai Krueger wrote:
P.S. perhaps adding const all along would make it clear which parameters
are
in parameters and which are out paramters
Yes, that would be a very good idea.
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[NON-Text Body part not included]
These messages that only consist of a PGP encoded piece are getting damn
annoying.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Hi!
I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
the following patch should be applied to
source/sam/SAM-Interface-handles.txt:
Well, I would say you
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:54:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: New sam
system':
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Weird that mutt generates encrypted files when I tell it to only sign
it... :-(
I'm working
In a hurry...
At 17:53 31.07.2002 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Hi!
I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
the following patch should be applied to
source/sam/SAM-Interface-handles.txt:
-NTSTATUS
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:12:04PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'Re:
New sam system':
-NTSTATUS sam_get_user_by_sid(NT_USER_TOKEN *access, uint32
access_desired, DOM_SID *usersid, SAM_USER_HANDLE **user)
-NTSTATUS sam_get_user_by_name(NT_USER_TOKEN *access, uint32
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 19:13, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:54:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: New sam
system':
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Weird that mutt generates encrypted files
Title: RE: New sam system
They are not encrypted, they are simply signed. The problem is, it attaches them to the email as a separate attachment. Some email readers don't automatically display certain attachments, so the main body of the message is all that is displayed. Since there isn't one
Kai Krueger wrote:
P.S. perhaps adding const all along would make it clear which parameters are
in parameters and which are out paramters
Yes, that would be a very good idea.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication
10 matches
Mail list logo