06, 2003 11:52
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Restrict Anonymous
>
>
> Hello list,
>
> Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
> RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4
> domains we're
> able to loo
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:52 AM
> To: Marc Kaplan
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Restrict Anonymous
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Marc Kaplan wrote:
>
> > Hello
EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Restrict Anonymous
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Marc Kaplan wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
> RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4 domains we're
> able to look up
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Marc Kaplan wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
> RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4 domains we're
> able to look up sequence, but never enumerate users and groups. For ADS
> domains, it seems th
Hello list,
Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4 domains we're
able to look up sequence, but never enumerate users and groups. For ADS
domains, it seems that even looking up sequence from the domain fails.
hp CR1501 and friends
This patch tries to make winbindd cope with the security option
'restrict anonymous=1' on NT4 and W2kS. When this option is set, the
DC disallows SAMR calls on unauthenticated connections, but does allow
LSA translations between names and sids.
Obviously winb
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 19:40, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:32:06PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > > In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
> > > like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting. Only 'restrict anony
Yannick Mercier wrote:
:
> Unfortunately, Ill have to back out to samba 2.2 because I'm using this
> samba server as a PDC also, and when I logon with my WinXP workstation,
> the PC reboots during "Loading desktop settings"
> I guess its a bug in the alpha version of samba
If the XP system reb
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:32:06PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
> > like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting. Only 'restrict anonymous = 1'
> > is currently supported though.
>
>
I installed the samba-3.0alpha20 (latest I think) and "restrict anonymous =
1" works
for denying the shares Listing from non-authentified users. As what Ive
read, the restrict anonymous = 2
is not implemented yet, but when it will be, it is supposed to deny all rpc
calls, which wil
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 15:08, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:
>
> > I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
> > "restrict anonymous" as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
> > to behav
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:
> I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
> "restrict anonymous" as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
> to behave from the start, in order to deny
> ALL anonymous connection
Hi,
I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
"restrict anonymous" as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
to behave from the start, in order to deny
ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man :
"When restrict anonymous is yes, all anonymous connection
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:13:20PM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
> I'm thinking about taking back the restrict anonymous parameter and
> using it to do Good Things. Previously in HEAD and currently in 2.2 it
> stops people connecting to shares anonymously but I think Mr Bartlett
> r
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:37:59PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > I propose that this parameter act like the RestrictAnonymous registry
> > setting, i.e it prevents anonymous access to the SAMR pipe and anonymous
> > access to the NetShareEnum RPC when set to 1. When set to 2, it
> > disallows
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:13:20PM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
> I'm thinking about taking back the restrict anonymous parameter and
> using it to do Good Things. Previously in HEAD and currently in 2.2 it
> stops people connecting to shares anonymously but I think Mr Bartlett
> r
I'm thinking about taking back the restrict anonymous parameter and
using it to do Good Things. Previously in HEAD and currently in 2.2 it
stops people connecting to shares anonymously but I think Mr Bartlett
removed it because it was either buggy or didn't do anything useful.
I pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
