On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:17:19AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
control/testing tool.
comments
Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:17:19AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
control/testing tool.
comments are welcome
--
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
I forgot to send patch with net_cache's entrypoint.
--
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba /
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
control/testing tool.
comments are welcome
Rafal, that looks pretty good. Since you ask, I do
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:17:19AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
control/testing tool.
comments
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:10:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You assume that any cached data will be in null terminated string format
which is not always the case.
I understand this is a design property - it's up to the caller to mess with
structs etc. This keeps the cache
