Oliver Rauch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>
>>
>> Tell me if it is of any interest.
>>
>>
>> Heidelberg Linoscan 1200 (SCSI)
>>
>
> This scanner may be compatible to the umax backend.
>
> When you tell me the scsi id of the scanner and you are able
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerard Klaver skrev:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 13:52 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I have some scanners lying around, and reading
>> http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/misc/mustek-scanners.html#UNSUPPORTED
>> and the referenced mailinglist entry
>> ht
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 13:52 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some scanners lying around, and reading
> http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/misc/mustek-scanners.html#UNSUPPORTED
> and the referenced mailinglist entry
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2004-August/0116
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>
>
> Tell me if it is of any interest.
>
>
> Heidelberg Linoscan 1200 (SCSI)
>
This scanner may be compatible to the umax backend.
When you tell me the scsi id of the scanner and you are able to compile
sane-backends from s
Hi,
I have some scanners lying around, and reading
http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/misc/mustek-scanners.html#UNSUPPORTED
and the referenced mailinglist entry
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2004-August/011685.html
I realized that instead of simply throwing out these scanners t
