> But the difference is who is in final control. In the end, the users of
> computers should be in final control, not their makers, or we have given
> up essential liberty. We can develop systems which provide suites of
> more specialized privileges to particular functions, without giving up
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:51 PM, David A. Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you interpret the definition of these terms of "general purpose" and
> "surveillance" differently, i.e., "limit applications to least
> privilege, and locally monitor their behavior", then I'd agree. But
> this
