On 2016-06-07 11:14, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 6 June 2016 at 17:27, Rupert Kolb
wrote:
Thanks for clarifying. I was not aware of this.
For the short term I downgraded to an older version of samba4 (to get
my
system running again).
(And yes, there is
On 6 June 2016 at 17:27, Rupert Kolb wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying. I was not aware of this.
>
> For the short term I downgraded to an older version of samba4 (to get my
> system running again).
> (And yes, there is an entry in bugzilla for "my" problem. And a
By the way if you have any support licenses with RedHat create a matching case
with them too. The developers give higher priority to cases created by paid
customers.
Original Message
From: Rupert Kolb
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2016 17:27
To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Updates
Thanks for clarifying. I was not aware of this.
For the short term I downgraded to an older version of samba4 (to get my
system running again).
(And yes, there is an entry in bugzilla for "my" problem. And a link to
an upstream patch )
In the medium term I'm looking for an other
On 6 June 2016 at 13:00, Rupert Kolb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any updates for samba4 ?
> At the moment in the repo is:
> samba4-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 from 13th of april.
>
> At download.samba.org is a updated version samba-4.2.12 from 2016-05-02 (one
> month
Hi,
are there any updates for samba4 ?
At the moment in the repo is:
samba4-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 from 13th of april.
At download.samba.org is a updated version samba-4.2.12 from 2016-05-02
(one month ago!)
As there are some bugs in 4.2.10, which seem to be solved in 4.2.12 (for
instance: