many ip addresses seems banned by scientific linux servers

hi: we notice some ip address can not access scientific linux servers (web or ftp). I don't know why. for example default sl7.repo list content below: baseurl=http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$slreleasever/$basearch/os/ http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/$slrelease

Re: many ip addresses seems banned by scientific linux servers

2015-08-03 2:39 GMT+08:00 Stephen John Smoogen : > On 2 August 2015 at 09:32, d tbsky wrote: >> hi: >>we notice some ip address can not access scientific linux servers >> (web or ftp). I don't know why. for example default sl7.repo list >> c

unfortunate bind dns attack

hi: one of our dns server was attack and shutdown, it seems cause by CVE-2015-5477. we are a small company, so we don't expect 0day attack happened to us. anyone suffers from the bug also? scientific linux has fixed it in SL5, but SL6 & SL7 don't have the fix now.. Regards, tbskyd

Re: unfortunate bind dns attack

2015-08-03 14:25 GMT+08:00 Bill Maidment : > There seems to be a bind-bind-9.9.4-18.el7_1.3.x86_64 in sl7-rolling-security > Is that a fix for this issue? > ok. I saw bind packages at sl6-rolling and sl7-rolling which fix the bugs. but only sl5 package go to the official channel. hope sl6/sl7 pack

Re: IP addresses that are blocked from SL6.x repos

2015-08-20 19:58 GMT+08:00 Nico Kadel-Garcia : > How long has this been going on? And have you tried doing "traceroute" > between your local systems, and the SL mirrors? And given the > difficulty, why not use a more local mirror? I notice this about 6-10 month I think. traceroute shows no diffe

SL 7.5 boot hang

Hi: I tried to upgrade our servers to SL 7.5. but one vpn box (intel j1900 cpu with 4 e1000 port) failed to boot. downgrade to 7.4 kernel 3.10.0-693.21.1 works fine. but with SL 7.5 kernel 3.10.0-862.2.3 or 3.10.0-862 the system will hang randomly during boot process. I have tried boot parameter

Re: Centos 8 last straw

Larry Linder >1 more week and we have to reload SL 7.6 and give it up. Maybe we will > try RH 9 in a few years. > you should wait for at least RHEL 8.1, or 8.2 to try/use it. current RHEL 8 is just to give you a feeling for next OS.

Re: CentOS 8 EOL; CentOS Stream?

is there any possibility for scientific linux 8? we are testing centos 8 for several monthes, but scientific linux is much better.

Re: Joint Fermilab/CERN statement on recent CentOS Changes

> On 2020/12/18 0:17, James F Amundson wrote: > > CERN and Fermilab acknowledge the recent decision to shift focus from > > CentOS Linux to CentOS Stream, and the sudden change of the end of life of > > the CentOS 8 release. This may entail significant consequences for the > > worldwide particle