Hi,
~Stack~ writes:
> I'm curious about your thoughts on what it means to have that
> sustainable footing going forward.
A little bit pontificating but here is my take: "sustainable computing"
must be "community all the way down". We must reject attempts by
flighty (or other) corporations to
I am familiar with Kubernetes that initiated though Google engineering
staff as I recall. For those who are quite unfamiliar with Kubernetes,
a brief overview with references is
On 12/11/20 10:09 AM, Brett Viren wrote:
My hope is they (we) take this current situation as a lesson and make a
radical change that puts all of our computing on more sustainable
footing as we go into the next decades.
I'm curious about your thoughts on what it means to have that
sustainable
I agree with your analysis, save for three comments. Mine also is not a
political comment, merely an analysis of fact.
Overwhelmingly throughout the world, HEP is funded by public funds
(sometimes from totalitarian dictatorships if one can call such
"public"). HEP addresses basic science,
This is not a political reply.
Keith Lofstrom writes:
> The big physics labs that supported Scientific Linux get
> much or all of their funding from the US government,
CERN is primarily funded by CERN nation states, of which US is not one.
FNAL, being a US DOE National Lab, is primarily
