Re: [Scons-dev] SCons Contrib Repository

2014-02-25 Thread Gary Oberbrunner
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 22:55 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > How about opening https://bitbucket.org/scons/contrib with various > > bits and pieces that people previously posted to Wiki? Tools and > > stuff. Learning be

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons Contrib Repository

2014-02-25 Thread Russel Winder
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 22:55 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > Hi again, > > How about opening https://bitbucket.org/scons/contrib with various > bits and pieces that people previously posted to Wiki? Tools and > stuff. Learning be example may be much easier than by following the > docs. Any code

[Scons-dev] SCons Contrib Repository

2014-02-25 Thread anatoly techtonik
Hi again, How about opening https://bitbucket.org/scons/contrib with various bits and pieces that people previously posted to Wiki? Tools and stuff. Learning be example may be much easier than by following the docs. -- anatoly t. ___ Scons-dev mailing

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons doesn't bootstrap without libxml2

2014-02-25 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:24 AM, anatoly techtonik > wrote: >> >> I am actually thinking about stripping Docbook toolchain altogether >> (better sooner than later), and move its maintenance into separate repo, >> because its addition tr

Re: [Scons-dev] Fwd: [SCons next-generation build system] Your organization application has been rejected.

2014-02-25 Thread Gary Oberbrunner
Thanks, I just emailed them. Will let you know. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:12 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > There is still a chance to participate under PSF umbrella: > https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Gary Oberbrunner > wrote: > > Too bad, w

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons doesn't bootstrap without libxml2

2014-02-25 Thread Gary Oberbrunner
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:24 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I am actually thinking about stripping Docbook toolchain altogether > (better sooner than later), and move its maintenance into separate repo, > because its addition tripled repository size for all subsequent versions. > That seems a bit

[Scons-dev] Quick PR merge

2014-02-25 Thread anatoly techtonik
https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-request/108/update-copyright-years-for-2014/diff PTAL. It should be easy. I get some more fixes going. -- anatoly t. ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev