Re: [Scons-dev] Two questions…

2016-05-06 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > 1. Is there a good reasons for having Perl code in our SCons > repository? Where? > 2. Is there a good reason why we have lots of Python code in XML files? > > Oh and… > > 3. Is there any reason why we should not switch from DocBook/XML to

Re: [Scons-dev] Two questions…

2016-04-14 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi, On 14.04.2016 18:48, Bill Deegan wrote: Russel, [...] Oh and… 3. Is there any reason why we should not switch from DocBook/XML to Asciidoctor for all the documentation? I'd like to postpone any discussion of the doc toolchain until after we get the python 3 work done, unle

Re: [Scons-dev] Two questions…

2016-04-14 Thread Bill Deegan
Russel, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > 1. Is there a good reasons for having Perl code in our SCons > repository? > Where? > > 2. Is there a good reason why we have lots of Python code in XML files? > Likely yes. if it's the python code which get's run to insert th

[Scons-dev] Two questions…

2016-04-14 Thread Russel Winder
1. Is there a good reasons for having Perl code in our SCons repository? 2. Is there a good reason why we have lots of Python code in XML files? Oh and… 3. Is there any reason why we should not switch from DocBook/XML to Asciidoctor for all the documentation? -- Russel. ===