Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-07 Thread William Blevins
I almost wonder whether its related to the Ubuntu rpmbuild setup, since rpmbuild is native to the RHEL (fedora, CentOS) systems, but Ubunut (Debian, etc) use apt and dpkg. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: William, On 07.08.2015 03:39, William Blevins wrote:

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-07 Thread Bill Deegan
Run the test with PRESERVE=1 then goto the created dir and run scons --debug=explain ? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:20 AM, William Blevins wblevins...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be wise to try something like changing that line to a build with --explain, so we might be able to figure out why SCons

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread Dirk Bächle
William, On 06.08.2015 20:59, William Blevins wrote: Dirk, I don't see information on the hardware and/or threads used for your profile attachment. Also, it is interesting that the update time slightly increased. I assume this is a side-effect of the lazy loading overhead. I am not worried

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread William Blevins
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: William, On 06.08.2015 20:59, William Blevins wrote: Dirk, I don't see information on the hardware and/or threads used for your profile attachment. Also, it is interesting that the update time slightly increased. I

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread William Blevins
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:23 PM, William Blevins wblevins...@gmail.com wrote: I ran that test in a loop for 10m or so and never got a failure though it might only happen when you thread it with other tests? I see two potential issues: 1. WhereIs('rpm') vs WhereIs('rpmbuild'); those two

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread William Blevins
I ran that test in a loop for 10m or so and never got a failure though it might only happen when you thread it with other tests? I see two potential issues: 1. WhereIs('rpm') vs WhereIs('rpmbuild'); those two processes have been split out for a very long time. 2. If rpm_build_root is not unique

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread William Blevins
Sounds like a plan :) On Aug 6, 2015 3:15 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: Hi there, just wanted to let you know that I have prepared a new trunk (default) with the change to slots in the core sources on my local machine. Full testsuite (runtest.py -a) shows no errors on my side...and

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread Dirk Bächle
On 06.08.2015 16:26, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Push when you are ready. Ahhh, tsss...pushed it ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMBh8P1m9Wo )! Only for the sexy people... :) Hi, the slots changes are online now. For all people interested, please find a comparison of before vs after the

Re: [Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread William Blevins
Dirk, I don't see information on the hardware and/or threads used for your profile attachment. Also, it is interesting that the update time slightly increased. I assume this is a side-effect of the lazy loading overhead. I am not worried about it though. Good work :) On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at

[Scons-dev] Mini announcement: v2.4 is near...

2015-08-06 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi there, just wanted to let you know that I have prepared a new trunk (default) with the change to slots in the core sources on my local machine. Full testsuite (runtest.py -a) shows no errors on my side...and I'm currently running it through the scons_testsuite