On 02/02/2011 09:42 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> The alternative would be to get it via fw_cfg.
>
How will this help? We want to lie that we support RTC wakeup without
actually supporting it.
We would be able to lie or say the truth at will. Distros that care
about WHQL/SVVP can turn the lie o
On 01/30/2011 04:33 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> In theory a guest could check whether RTC alarm reboot is supported,
> if not it keeps awake, if it is it can set the alarm to sleep. So
> if seabios lies it could break that guest.
>
Theoretically possible.
> However that's an unlikely scen
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:43:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 09:42 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> The alternative would be to get it via fw_cfg.
> >>>
> >How will this help? We want to lie that we support RTC wakeup without
> >actually supporting it.
>
> We would be able to lie o
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:31:37AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 04:33 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In theory a guest could check whether RTC alarm reboot is supported,
> >>> if not it keeps awake, if it is it can set the alarm to sleep. So
> >>> if seabios lies it could br
On 01/30/2011 04:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:29:57AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:17:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > WHQL complains otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
>
> Can you get this acked by one of the kvm/qemu ma
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:25:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 05:23 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:15:49PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 01/30/2011 05:13 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> >> On
On 01/30/2011 05:13 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 04:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:29:57AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:17:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>
On 01/30/2011 05:23 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:15:49PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 05:13 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 01/30/2011 04:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:15:49PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 05:13 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 01/30/2011 04:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:29:57AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> >> >>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 04:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:29:57AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:17:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> > WHQL complains otherwise.
> >> >
> >> > Signed
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 03:30:43PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > WHQL complains otherwise.
> > >
> > > Is there something further that should be activated, to actually
> > > allow the wakeup to work? Hm, isn't S4 hibernate?
> >
> > Not in a bios. Qemu currently exits on
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:29:57AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:17:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > WHQL complains otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
>
> Can you get this acked by one of the kvm/qemu maintainers?
>
Avi, Marcelo, Anthony can you look a
Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > WHQL complains otherwise.
> >
> > Is there something further that should be activated, to actually
> > allow the wakeup to work? Hm, isn't S4 hibernate?
>
> Not in a bios. Qemu currently exits on S4 (hibernate to disk). Restarting
> it activates resume process. On real H
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:17:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> WHQL complains otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
Can you get this acked by one of the kvm/qemu maintainers?
-Kevin
___
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
http://www.seabio
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 03:01:43PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Typo in subject.
>
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > WHQL complains otherwise.
>
> Is there something further that should be activated, to actually
> allow the wakeup to work? Hm, isn't S4 hibernate?
>
>
Not in a bios. Qemu currently exits
Typo in subject.
Gleb Natapov wrote:
> WHQL complains otherwise.
Is there something further that should be activated, to actually
allow the wakeup to work? Hm, isn't S4 hibernate?
//Peter
___
SeaBIOS mailing list
SeaBIOS@seabios.org
http://www.seabio
WHQL complains otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
diff --git a/src/acpi.c b/src/acpi.c
index 18830dc..27a78a8 100644
--- a/src/acpi.c
+++ b/src/acpi.c
@@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ build_fadt(int bdf)
fadt->plvl2_lat = cpu_to_le16(0xfff); // C2 state not supported
fadt->plvl3_lat = cpu_to_le1
17 matches
Mail list logo
