Changeset: e6aeeec33e53
Author:uta
Date: 2013-07-19 12:53 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e6aeeec33e53
8016579: (process) IOException thrown by ProcessBuilder.start() method is
incorrectly encoded
Reviewed-by: martin, dxu
! src/share/native/java/io/io_util.c
Looks good.
--Sean
On 07/19/2013 12:39 PM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
Please review the following change to correct the handling of backdated OCSP
requests:
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8020940 [not yet visible]
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8020940/webrev.00
It modifie
Changeset: e013b32118af
Author:darcy
Date: 2013-07-19 09:42 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e013b32118af
8020948: Fix doclint issues in misc package-info.java files
Reviewed-by: dholmes, chegar
! src/share/classes/java/nio/file/attribute/package-info.java
! sr
Changeset: 0a9f5cbe37d9
Author:ksrini
Date: 2013-07-19 07:22 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/0a9f5cbe37d9
8017216: javac doesn't fill in end position for some errors of type not found
8019421: Javac doesn't fill in end position for some annotation related
Please review the following change to correct the handling of backdated OCSP
requests:
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8020940 [not yet visible]
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8020940/webrev.00
It modifies the OCSP client to verify the validity interval for an OCSP
resp
It was necessary, but I found the unused variable that was triggering
the compile error without it.
Tony
On 07/18/2013 03:40 PM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
Just noticed that the newly-added import statement on line 32 seems
redundant?
Webrev seems the same?
Thanks,
Valerie
On 07/18/13 15
Your changes look good.
Thanks.
On 16 Jul 2013, at 20:11, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review my JDK 8 fix for 8010748:
>
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8010748
>
> This add a few useful API additions to JEP 124 (Enhance the Certificate
> Revocation-Checking API) from experience with
Oh, another thing, I noticed that for ProblemList.txt, line 261 is a
duplicate of line 289.
Otherwise, looks fine.
BTW, I didn't get to finish reviewing your second fix today, may take a
few more days to get that done...
Thanks,
Valerie
On 07/19/13 11:19, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
It was nece
Both of them get removed in the next webrev.
Tony
On 07/19/2013 04:21 PM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
Oh, another thing, I noticed that for ProblemList.txt, line 261 is a
duplicate of line 289.
Otherwise, looks fine.
BTW, I didn't get to finish reviewing your second fix today, may take a
f
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Without the ability to send a token when there is a failure, a Java program
> has no chance to tell the other side what's happening. This is very
> user-unfriendly. Also, in the case of SPNEGO, a "reject" NegTokenResp token
> will never be abl
It is not supported at present. Will consider it in the future.
Xuelei
On 7/18/2013 3:52 AM, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:45:19PM -0400, roger riggs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there support in SSLEngine/TLS to support Pre-Shared Keys?
>> I have been looking for relevant doc and h
11 matches
Mail list logo
