> If you have the time - have a look in
>
> xml.apache.org/security/1.1
>
> If you confirm it's OK, I'll do the final publish and release.
Sadly we share similar hours, but I'm not in OZ.
My test ran in 360 ms, down from 910 in the original 1.1 release.
-- Scott
Hi Ed,
I am interested in knowing the hardware that you used.
Pl let me know.
Thanks,
Sandeep Kumar
-Original Message-
From: Kenworthy, Edward (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: OUT OF MEMORY Exception, is it posi
FYI.
Note: forwarded message attached.
=
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/--- Begin Message ---
The Proposed Final Draft Specification for
JSR-000105 XML Digital Signature APIs
is now available from
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/stage?listBy=proposed
as well as the
Hi,
I'm refacotoring the c14n and i see that i can get some minor
speed-ups, but I have found something strange. It is this vector correct?
xml-security/data/interop/c14n/Y4/c14n-24.txt
It isn't a valid xml file, I'm missing something?
Perhaps i need to read better the recomendation. But any
Thanks Berin. I got all the stuff from CVS, got the config.xml to load
correctly (whew), and now XMLCipherTester is working for 5 out of 9 tests,
which is good enough for my purposes for now.
If I am not completely lost, version 1.04 does NOT contain the XMLCipher class
at all, and so my build
One of the really cool things about c14n is it doesn't necessarily
result in valid XML .
C14n takes as an input a node-set, which may not be a complete XML
document. That means you can use it to canonicalise only the data in
the document that you are interested in signing.
As an example - if
Cool!
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
FYI.
Note: forwarded message attached.
=
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Subject:
JSR 105: Proposed Final Draft
From:
Harold Ogle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Fri, 1
Scott Cantor wrote:
Sadly we share similar hours, but I'm not in OZ.
LOL.
My test ran in 360 ms, down from 910 in the original 1.1 release.
Now that is really really cool. I'm going to print now!
Cheers,
Berin
Daniel wrote:
Thanks Berin. I got all the stuff from CVS, got the config.xml to load
correctly (whew), and now XMLCipherTester is working for 5 out of 9 tests,
which is good enough for my purposes for now.
That sounds like you might be using a 1.3 JCE?
If I am not completely lost, version 1.
Peoples,
I have just made 1.1 "official". It's on the web, with updated docs.
I'll also try to get an announcement out (for both Java and C++) in the
next few days.
Cheers,
Berin
Berin,
I have trouble running "ant -f build-ant1.5.xml" straight from latest cvs...Am getting
test
failures. see enclosed out.txt.
-- dims
--- Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peoples,
>
> I have just made 1.1 "official". It's on the web, with updated docs.
>
> I'll also try t
Here's the junit report - http://nagoya.apache.org/~dims/xmlsec-junit/
-- dims
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Berin,
>
> I have trouble running "ant -f build-ant1.5.xml" straight from latest cvs...Am
> getting test
> failures. see enclosed out.txt.
>
> -- dims
>
>
>
> ---
Dims,
Do you have the strong crypto policy files installed in your JRE?
Cheers,
Berin
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Here's the junit report - http://nagoya.apache.org/~dims/xmlsec-junit/
-- dims
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Berin,
I have trouble running "ant -f build-ant
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue
aff
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue
aff
15 matches
Mail list logo
