Preserving MAIL_IS_SEEN state?

2014-05-18 Thread Jerry Malcolm
I am desperately trying to figure out a way to access a message without having the MAIL_IS_SEEN flag set. I have some background server apps that need to scan folders and do various automated maintenance tasks. I do not want unread mail to be marked as seen just because the utility happened

Re: Preserving MAIL_IS_SEEN state?

2014-06-19 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Jerry, Thank for joining and sorry for the late answer. The best way to tackle this is to point the rfc section where you think james does not behave as expected. You could also upload a simple test case that shows this. Eric On 05/18/2014 10:06 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote: > I am desperate

Re: Preserving MAIL_IS_SEEN state?

2014-07-05 Thread Jerry Malcolm
Hi Eric, The RFC pretty doesn't specifically refer to the SEEN flag in reference to READ_ONLY state. But it does say that: If the client is not permitted to modify the mailbox but is permitted read access, the mailbox is selected as read-only, It doesn't specifically define READ-

Re: Preserving MAIL_IS_SEEN state?

2014-07-12 Thread Eric Charles
We rely on the RFC to implement and sometimes there are some grey zones. If the RFC does not clearly define things, we are free to interpret it. In this particular case, it tend to agree with you. The logic is implemented in FlagsResponseEncoder and ImapResponseComposerImpl.flags classes. The wa