Hi
some days ago I asked for an implementation of the Content-Enricher
pattern on the ServiceMix user list.
(http://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/DataEnricher.html). But I
never received any reply to that mail. So I started to implement that
pattern and attached the first version as p
mentioned before I'm not sure if this is
correct. Does this makes sense??? Is it a bug or a bad workaround for my
problem??
The question to me is: Is it correct to 'loose' the information about the
operation?? Do I have to add this information within my routing rule reading the
proper
Hi
> Anyway, I think you're on the right track. There's no reason why the
> camel SE would set the jbi.operation property when going from jbi to
> camel, but not use it when going from camel to jbi. In addition, we
> could make the operation also configurable on the endpoint (to be
> consistent
> I also meant that if there is not, it should be added :-)
Ok... ;-)
I transport in CXF, so I'm sure we could
> find a way to use it from EJB to access JBI for example... Have you
> already thought about such things ?
>
>
> On 10/20/07, Kristian Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > yesterday I fin
Hi
> > * Better configuration of ServiceMix Service within Geronimo
>
> This is always something I wanted to do, but never quite got the time
> to get into it. We also have a few portlets that I developped using
> pluto which could be integrated into Geronimo console, but i never
> really finish
Hi Guillaume
looks ok for me. Thanks!
Kristian
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2007 22:42
> An: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Betreff: [jira] Resolved: (SM-1085) Additional geronimo
> deployment
