[SharpOS Developers] ES-Os (ECMA)

2008-04-16 Thread Jonathan Dickinson
Hi All, A very interesting project by Google. http://code.google.com/p/es-operating-system -- Jonathan - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's sti

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Managed Operating System Alliance

2008-04-16 Thread Bruce Markham
"Reading their code and ideas?" The most I think any of us has done, was I spent 30 minutes one day perusing some files - and my publicly broadcast opinion on it stated something to the effect of how close it was to what we were already planning to do. And since then, I haven't had enough free tim

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Managed Operating System Alliance

2008-04-16 Thread grover
So far the response from JNode has been positive. I'll await responses from the active community. _ Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Bruce Markham Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. April 2008 14:08 An: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [SharpOS De

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Managed Operating System Alliance

2008-04-16 Thread Jonathan Dickinson
Please Bruce, if you have a problem with me take it out with me personally via email to my personal account instead of wasting everyones time with stupid flames on a public mailing list. On 16/04/2008, Bruce Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Reading their code and ideas?" > > The most I think

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Managed Operating System Alliance

2008-04-16 Thread Bruce Markham
Honestly, I was just pointing out the extent of my awareness of the situation. Obviously you, and as a result, perhaps some JNode people, are alot more worked up about this than obvious or reasonable. I didn't mean any offense, and I was stating what I did more for the record than anything else. -

[SharpOS Developers] IL Reader

2008-04-16 Thread Jonathan Dickinson
Hi All, Feel free to port my IL reader if you so wish. Please just send us any patches that you make (e.g. finishing opcodes). -- Jonathan - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Managed Operating System Alliance

2008-04-16 Thread Dennis Hayes
I have access to a tool that converts Java to C#, that I would be glad to use on any of the JNode code. I don't know how they would feel about that, I would not want to step on any toes. I also have a good bit of experiance hand converting Java to C#. in Particular, Mainsoft donated a Java v

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Managed Operating System Alliance

2008-04-16 Thread Bruce Markham
Okay, we definitely need to talk to some JNode people before anyone does anything else in this arena. There's obviously alot we can do here, and we haven't had an organized discussion on the matter. Does anyone else have any further suggestions, comments, or complaints, about the general idea of

[SharpOS Developers] Mono changes licesene for C# compiler

2008-04-16 Thread Dennis Hayes
For any of those who missed the anouncment, Mono i schamges the licesenes for their C# complier from GPL to X11 starting with the Mono 2.0 release. Dennis - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.---

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Mono changes licesene for C# compiler

2008-04-16 Thread grover
What benefit does the X11 license give them? I don't want to read this stuff up. I actually hate this crap. Can't we all agree on a common term for freedom? _ Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Dennis Hayes Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. April 2008 22:23 An: sharpos

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Mono changes licesene for C# compiler

2008-04-16 Thread Dennis Hayes
X11 only requires that you keep the copyrights in the source code, otherwise, all use if fair game, including keeping changes secret and selling it. The old mono liceses were C# compiler - GPL Runtime - LGPL Libraries and Tools - X11 New C# compiler - X11 Runtime - LGPL

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Mono changes licesene for C# compiler

2008-04-16 Thread Phil Garcia
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:25 PM, grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What benefit does the X11 license give them? I don't want to read this stuff > up. I actually hate this crap. Can't we all agree on a common term for > freedom? > X11 for Mono is good news for everyone! It's a less restrictive

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Mono changes licesene for C# compiler

2008-04-16 Thread Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu
> X11 for Mono is good news for everyone! It's a less restrictive > license than GPL. While I like GPL, I think BSD and X11 licenses are > better in terms of less restrictions; however, those licenses also > have no "give back" provisions. That's not quite true. They do not have give back REQIOREM

[SharpOS Developers] Hey

2008-04-16 Thread Tristan Miller
Hey, I heard about your project through the intertubes, and am interested in becoming a developer. I spent the last few years working on a mainly managed operating system (in java), but do to a recent HDD crash I lost all of the source (and discovered the hard way the benefits of source control

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Hey

2008-04-16 Thread Sander van Rossen
Hi! Unfortunatly the server has a habit of going down and coming up again, i believe it's an issue with redmine.. hopefully it'll get fixed some time soon. Anyway, it's up again: http://www.sharpos.org/ And here's the starting guide: http://www.sharpos.org/redmine/wiki/3/Howto_Start_Developing Che

Re: [SharpOS Developers] processor patch 3

2008-04-16 Thread Sander van Rossen
Does anyone have an AMD processor here? I would test it if i had one... On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:11 AM, joão manganeli neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So this is the 3º patch for Processor.cs with some luck it will identify > correct amd family and model > to apply in Kernel\Core\ADC\X86\Proces

Re: [SharpOS Developers] processor patch 3

2008-04-16 Thread grover
I do, but don't know how :) > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im > Auftrag von Sander van Rossen > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 08:10 > An: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [SharpOS Developers] processor patch