Thanks Ranjit. The word "MUST" seems to throw some vendors off. I saw at
least one device that behaves this way due to the word "MUST". Is there way to
get that reviewed and edited?
Thanks,
Hoil
From: Ranjit Avasarala
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 1:40 PM
To: H
Ranjit,
BTW, did you notice that there is an erata applying to section 9 of
RFC4028? If you didn't notice, it might be confusing you.
On 5/28/21 5:59 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
On 5/28/21 4:40 PM, Ranjit Avasarala wrote:
Hi Holi
The RFC says UAS should add a Require: timer in response when UAC
On 5/28/21 4:40 PM, Ranjit Avasarala wrote:
Hi Holi
The RFC says UAS should add a Require: timer in response when UAC is the
refresher to indicate to UAC that it is the refresher. But I think this is
redundant as UAC anyway knows it is the refresher and does not need a
reminder from UAS.
The U
Hi Ranjit, thanks for taking a look.
However, I'm more interested in case where UAS is responding to UAC's request
with refresher as itself (uac). Consider this case -
UAC INVITE (Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uac, Supported: timer) >
UAS
UAC < 200 OK (Session-Expires: 1800;refr
