.
>
> Regards,
>
> Attila
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
> Harsimran Singh
> Sent: 01 June 2009 11:25
> To: Sip-implementors@lis
Hi,
Please look here http://ictbackyard.com/?p=1.
Kind regards,
- Tomasz Zieleniewski
2009/6/1 Harsimran Singh
> Hi
>
> I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description
> given in the RFC looks inconsistent.
> My call flow is as follows:
>
> INVITE with sdp & Supp 100rel
> ---
plementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.
Hi
I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description given
in the RFC looks inconsistent.
My call flow is as follows:
INVITE with sdp & Supp 100rel
--->
100 Trying
<
180 Ringing w
:55 PM
To: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.
Hi
I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description given
in the RFC looks inconsistent.
My call flow is as follows:
INVITE with sdp & Supp 100rel
--->
100
Behalf Of Harsimran
Singh
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 3:55 PM
To: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] 200OK without SDP.
Hi
I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description
given in the RFC looks inconsistent.
My call flow is as follows
Hi
I am confused about the section 13.2 of RFC 3261. The description
given in the RFC looks inconsistent.
My call flow is as follows:
INVITE with sdp & Supp 100rel
--->
100 Trying
<
180 Ringing with Req 100rel & sdp
<
PRACK no sdp
>
200OK for prack no s
