Dinoop writes:
>UAC B2BUA UaB
> | 1:INVITE(SDP) ||
> +--->||
> | 2:100[INV] ||
> |<---+|
>
Thanks Worley and Paul,
My scenario is,
UAC B2BUA UaB
| 1:INVITE(SDP) ||
+--->||
| 2:100[INV] ||
|<---+
Dinoop,
On 5/26/17 4:50 AM, Dinoop wrote:
Thanks Worley and Paul,
My scenario is,
UAC B2BUA UaB
| 1:INVITE(SDP) ||
+--->||
| 2:100[INV] |
Dinoop writes:
> How can a B2BUA handle message crossing of 200OK(invite) over 200OK(PRACK)?
> Is it a correct approach for the implementation to reject the
> 200OK(INVITE) until it receives PRACK response?
>
> I have gone through the RFC 6337, unfortunately nothing is mentioned about
> this scen
On 5/24/17 2:53 AM, Dinoop wrote:
Hi,
How can a B2BUA handle message crossing of 200OK(invite) over 200OK(PRACK)?
Is it a correct approach for the implementation to reject the
200OK(INVITE) until it receives PRACK response?
I have gone through the RFC 6337, unfortunately nothing is mentioned a
Hi,
How can a B2BUA handle message crossing of 200OK(invite) over 200OK(PRACK)?
Is it a correct approach for the implementation to reject the
200OK(INVITE) until it receives PRACK response?
I have gone through the RFC 6337, unfortunately nothing is mentioned about
this scenario.
--
Thanks & Re
