Re: SLING-449: Renaming core to engine

2008-05-14 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 14.05.2008, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Felix Meschberger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 14.05.2008, 10:23 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > >> Hi, > >> > >> should we also rename the package from core to engine (and everything > >> else)? I think so, bu

Re: SLING-449: Renaming core to engine

2008-05-14 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 14.05.2008, 10:23 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: Hi, should we also rename the package from core to engine (and everything else)? I think so, but I just wanted to check before doing :) Yes, I would say so, too. In addtion: the core (or engine)

Re: SLING-449: Renaming core to engine

2008-05-14 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 14.05.2008, 10:23 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Hi, > > should we also rename the package from core to engine (and everything > else)? I think so, but I just wanted to check before doing :) Yes, I would say so, too. In addtion: the core (or engine) bundle provides API.

SLING-449: Renaming core to engine

2008-05-14 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, should we also rename the package from core to engine (and everything else)? I think so, but I just wanted to check before doing :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]