On Feb 6, 9:06 pm, Tony Sceats wrote:
> It's been a while since there's been a thread like this, so I thought it
> would be fun :)
>
> so, have you got any?
>
> I've got 2 to share today:
>
> alt >and then
> alt <
>
woo, that's kinda interesting.
It seems to pick the last "word" for each entry
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Daniel Bush wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 6, 9:06 pm, Tony Sceats wrote:
> > It's been a while since there's been a thread like this, so I thought it
> > would be fun :)
> >
> > so, have you got any?
> >
> > I've got 2 to share today:
> >
> > alt >and then
> > alt <
> >
>
At the risk of being called an oldie, I keep using !-notation since
the early tcsh days. E.g. "!$" or !:2-3.
You can also use things like
!less:*
to fetch the parameters of the latest less command.
I can't type alt-> because alt-shift is my keyboard language-switching
combination, so I don't kn
2009/2/9 Amos Shapira :
[snip]
>
> And one last thing, related to security - if you type a sensitive
> string on the command line and get it into your history, use "history
> -d" to delete this line.
>
There is an easier way around this. Most shells, bash included will
exclude a line from the hist
Owen Townend wrote:
2009/2/9 Amos Shapira :
[snip]
And one last thing, related to security - if you type a sensitive
string on the command line and get it into your history, use "history
-d" to delete this line.
There is an easier way around this. Most shells, bash included will
exclude a lin
2009/2/9 Amos Shapira
> At the risk of being called an oldie, I keep using !-notation since
> the early tcsh days. E.g. "!$" or !:2-3.
>
> You can also use things like
>
> !less:*
>
> to fetch the parameters of the latest less command.
>
> I can't type alt-> because alt-shift is my keyboard langu
2009/2/9 Rick Welykochy :
> Owen Townend wrote:
>>
>> 2009/2/9 Amos Shapira :
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> And one last thing, related to security - if you type a sensitive
>>> string on the command line and get it into your history, use "history
>>> -d" to delete this line.
>>>
>>
>> There is an easier way a
