Hi Gustavo,
Good to hear. Let me also publish this article: [Snappy Interfaces revisit]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1stvuyn6evk9df7s58ZSAq7g5QOV5gxmWCVqiyEuwDDs/edit?usp=sharing
Feel like the work flow in page 3 need to update after you release the new
snapd. YC
2016-12-14 10:40
Le 13/12/2016 à 22:57, Kyle Fazzari a écrit :
> Hey everyone.
Hey Kyle
>
> I feel it coming on... this is going to be a tome. tl;dr... snapcraft
> could be smarter than it is. But would that lead to its doing more for
> you than you want? We'd like to find out.
>
> I've spoken to a few of you
One detail: note that once your snap goes into the store and passes
reviews, that issue goes away. Actual users of your snap in the wild don't
have to say --dangerous.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer <
gustavo.nieme...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hey Peng,
>
> We've overlooked a
IMHO. a password only works for console but not for internet is more secure
and developer will appreciate.
2016-12-14 8:40 GMT+08:00 Mark Shuttleworth :
> On 13/12/16 19:35, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > I'm very confused. You have SSO. You tell people to create an SSO
> > account to
On 13/12/16 19:35, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I'm very confused. You have SSO. You tell people to create an SSO
> account to use the device. Yet SSO can't be used to log into the
> system at the console. ??
SSH keys associated with the SSO account are pulled into the device, so
you can SSH to it.
We
I believe SSO account is simply to host your ssh keys that can be used to login
to the device. Perhaps better documentation will provide improved clarity.
-- Luther
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 8:36 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
This is with a very freshly downloaded image,
I am assuming console means the login prompt like this:
==
Ubuntu Core 16 on 192.168.0.10 (ttyO0)
localhost login:
==
I do feel that the current secure default works the best. Those who need to set
a local password will find a way to do it since it is their requirement
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:57:20PM -0800, Kyle Fazzari wrote:
> *Option 2*: Automatically take care of everything. If you modify a part
> with dependencies, snapcraft will rebuild those dependencies as it sees
> fit without your needing to say so. Similarly, if you clean a part with
This options
The thing that worries me is the likelihood of bad passwords being set.
We don't necessarily know what the software is on the device, and people
are likely to reuse passwords that are important to them on other
systems. So we though SSH enablement was the cleaner safer way to tty.
Happy to take
Indeed, from the example it looks like you could make it work with only
the single `part-aa` plus some good use of the organize keyword along
with stage/snap to whitelist only those components.
On 12/13/2016 02:25 PM, Matthew Aguirre wrote:
> Can you do the organize in the build instead of post
Can you do the organize in the build instead of post organizing with the
dump? I used to do something similar with copy, but then dump didn't do
what I needed, so switched it up.
On Dec 13, 2016 5:21 PM, "Joe Coates" wrote:
> My snap includes a part which has an
So... the instructions saying to create an account on launchpad etc.
don't get you a console login, by design? That's highly confusing,
and could stand clarifying.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Gregory Lutostanski
wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:52 AM, David Callé wrote:
> An easy way to achieve this is to install the "classic" snap
Ah, yeah, I'd forgotten about that, thanks.
- Dan
--
Snapcraft mailing list
Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 15:32 -0300, Sergio Cazzolato wrote:
> I am trying to access to dbus from a python script in my snap and I am
> getting the error dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
> org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Failed to connect to socket
> /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket:
On 13/12/2016 20:46, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm building debs and snaps for a raspberry pi 3.
> Questions:
> 1) when last I did this, https://ubuntu-pi-flavour-maker.org/ was the
> best place to get real ubuntu for the pi 3 (the one listed on the
> ubuntu wiki didn't boot reliably). Is that
Hi,
I'm building debs and snaps for a raspberry pi 3.
Questions:
1) when last I did this, https://ubuntu-pi-flavour-maker.org/ was the
best place to get real ubuntu for the pi 3 (the one listed on the
ubuntu wiki didn't boot reliably). Is that still true? What do other
folks use?
2) if one were
I am trying to access to dbus from a python script in my snap and I am
getting the error dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Failed to connect to socket
/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: Permission denied, it happens when I do
bus =
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 09:31 +1000, Michi Henning wrote:
> > In snapd 2.20 we are working to have the 'dbus' generic interface
> > in place[2]. With it you can specify the bus name (session or
> > system), the well-known name to bind to and then use interface
> > connections to connect your client
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 09:31 +1000, Michi Henning wrote:
> >
> > In snapd 2.20 we are working to have the 'dbus' generic interface in
> > place[2].
> > With it you can specify the bus name (session or system), the well-known
> > name to
> > bind to and then use interface connections to connect
On 13/12/16 09:42, Stuart Bishop wrote:
>> I might be one step close to getting this to work but I was wondering what
>> is the common/recommended practice to do what I’m trying to achieve here?
>
>
> I used the same approach you did, and got it building locally and working (
>
On 13 December 2016 at 02:27, Ivan Lezhnjov IV
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m working on pgbouncer snap package and as I’m new to snaps I wanted to
> ask the community what is the current preferred way to install a program’s
> configuration files that are meant to be edited by
21 matches
Mail list logo