Oh, I figured out the root cause. It's the permission.
After added the user to the docker group, I can run docker commands now.
$sudo gpasswd -a ${USER} docker
Docker snap works perfectly! Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Peng Liu wrote:
> Hi Loïc,
>
> I also realized that might be a p
Hi Loïc,
I also realized that might be a problem in an old version. So I upgraded
the snapd to the latest version.
$ snap --version
snap 2.16ubuntu3
snapd 2.16ubuntu3
series 16
ubuntu 16.04
And I tried to install the docker from both stable and edge channel.
In both cases, the plug and slot can
Hi,
What's the output of snap --version?
Thanks!
- Loïc Minier
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Peng Liu wrote:
> Hi Loïc,
>
> I encountered some errors when I tried to connect the interfaces, for
> example:
>
> sudo snap connect docker:d
Hi Loïc,
I encountered some errors when I tried to connect the interfaces, for
example:
sudo snap connect docker:docker-cli docker:docker-daemon
error: cannot perform the following tasks: - Connect docker:docker-cli to
docker:docker-daemon
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:42:13AM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> On Fr, 2016-10-21 at 00:28 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > Any blockers for s390x?
> > We need an OS snap for this arch first, and we don't have this ATM;
> > maintaining a .deb might be less work – not sure.
> we definitely have
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Loïc Minier
wrote:
>
> Very nice. What's the ETA on snap-declaration?
>
> (have to check on that; it's either just an admin thing or "soon")
>
So it's now exposed in the store web UI for reviews since a day or two.
I've pushed new snaps this morning and as
On 20/10/16 20:18, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Hmm, that feels like something Snaps should learn to express as a
> declaration, right?
Yes, I think that's definitely something we want to enable, we just need
to find a nice cross-distro way to do that.
Mark
--
Snapcraft mailing list
Snapcraft@lists
hi,
On Fr, 2016-10-21 at 00:28 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> > Any blockers for s390x?
>
> We need an OS snap for this arch first, and we don't have this ATM;
> maintaining a .deb might be less work – not sure.
>
we definitely have one ;)
http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/core-builds/
but i
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Dustin Kirkland
wrote:
> > Because the docker.sock path is hardcoded in a lot of images, this snap
> > conflicts with docker debs, so make sure you remove them first:
> > sudo apt purge docker docker-engine
>
> Hmm, that feels like something Snaps should learn to
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Docker is since some days available as a properly confined snap. This will
> work on top of classic Ubuntu 16.04+ or on top of an up-to-date Ubuntu Core
> series 16.
Nice work :-)
> Because the docker.sock path is hardcoded in a lot o
MUCH FANFARE!
Awesome news Loïc! I'll be giving this a thorough evaluation on armhf and
amd64 machines I have in-house later this weekend from an end user
perspective. Thanks for reaching out and letting us know this was ready for
trial.
All the best,
Charles
Charles Butler - Juju Charmer
Com
Hi!
Docker is since some days available as a properly confined snap. This will
work on top of classic Ubuntu 16.04+ or on top of an up-to-date Ubuntu Core
series 16.
Because the docker.sock path is hardcoded in a lot of images, this snap
conflicts with docker debs, so make sure you remove them fi
12 matches
Mail list logo
