Is SOLR compatible with Lucene 3* or Flex branch?
> Most of SOLR-773 is incorporated into trunk at this point w/ the
> exception of Cartesian Tier filtering (and, more generically,
> intelligent field type specific spatial filtering via SOLR-1568). I
> hope to complete that in the next week or so.
>
> Geohash is in and supported by Solr right no
e), or
Geohash (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash)
I haven't tried "Local Lucene" and SOLR-773 yet.
Thanks,
Fuad Efendi
+1 416-993-2060
http://www.tokenizer.ca/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831458#action_12831458
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-1764:
---
Funny, it might happen that this is not a pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831458#action_12831458
]
Fuad Efendi edited comment on SOLR-1764 at 2/9/10 2:00 PM:
---
F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831268#action_12831268
]
Fuad Efendi edited comment on SOLR-1764 at 2/9/10 2:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831268#action_12831268
]
Fuad Efendi edited comment on SOLR-1764 at 2/9/10 2:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831268#action_12831268
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-1764:
---
Michael,
Which version of Java are you usin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi closed SOLR-711.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Shalin for pointing to SOLR-475 which is very advanced solution to term
counting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12635221#action_12635221
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-667:
--
Paul, Yonik, thanks for your efforts;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-711:
-
Description:
>From
>[http://www.nabble.com/SimpleFacets%3A-Performance-Boost-for-Tokenized-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-711:
-
Description:
>From
>[http://www.nabble.com/SimpleFacets%3A-Performance-Boost-for-Tokenized-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-711:
-
Comment: was deleted
> SimpleFacets: Performance Boost for Tokenized Fields for smaller DocSet us
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: search
Affects Versions: 1.3
Reporter: Fuad Efendi
Fix For: 1.4
>From
>[url]http://www.nabble.com/SimpleFacets%3A-Performance-Boost-for-Tokenized-Fields-td19033760.html[/url]:
Scenario:
- 10,0
such as... using Term Vectors for fast faceting on tokenized... but it
is in TODOs of source files!
cNET data was so small when SimpleFacets were born, only
40 docs...
Quoting Shalin Shekhar Mangar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Only 3.so alienmust...add..more...i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-671:
-
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
Issue Type: Test (was: Bug)
Affects Version/s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12619227#action_12619227
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-671:
--
{code}
long t
gt; Environment: SOLR-1.3-DEV
> Schema:
>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>
> sortMissingLas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-671:
-
Priority: Major (was: Trivial)
Issue Type: Bug (was: Test)
Here is test case, similar to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-671:
-
Priority: Trivial (was: Blocker)
Issue Type: Test (was: Bug)
I executed another query which works
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-671:
-
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Affects Version/s: 1.3
> Range queries with 'slon
Type: Bug
Environment: SOLR-1.3-DEV
Schema:
Reporter: Fuad Efendi
Range queries always return all results (do not filter):
timestamp:[1019386401114 TO 1219386401114]
timestamp:[1019386401114 TO 1219386401114]
timestamp:[1019386401114 TO 121
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12619058#action_12619058
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Guys at LingPipe (Natural Language Processing)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618824#action_12618824
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-667:
--
Thanks Yonik, I even guess that in some c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618805#action_12618805
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-667:
--
Paul,
I have never ever suggested to use '
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618766#action_12618766
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
I don't think ConcurrentHashMap wil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618750#action_12618750
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-667:
--
bq. ...safety, where nothing bad ever happens t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618578#action_12618578
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-669:
--
To confirm:
- SOLR uses Lucene internals (with cac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618574#action_12618574
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-669:
--
This piece of code in SimpleFacets:
{code}
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter
st
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JR
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-669:
-
Remaining Estimate: 1680h (was: 0.03h)
Original Estimate: 1680h (was: 0.03h)
> SOLR currently d
Affects Versions: 1.3
Reporter: Fuad Efendi
It is huge performance bottleneck and it describes huge difference between
qtime and SolrJ's elapsedTime. I quickly browsed SolrIndexSearcher: it caches
only (Key, DocSet/DocList ) key-value pairs and it does not have
cache for (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: SimplestConcurrentLRUCache.java
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performance bo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: (was: SimplestLRUCache.java)
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performance bo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: (was: ConcurrentLRUWeakCache.java)
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: (was: ConcurrentLRUWeakCache.java)
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: SimplestLRUCache.java
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performance bo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: (was: SimplestLRUCache.java)
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performance bo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: SimplestLRUCache.java
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performance bo
Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: ConcurrentFIFOCache.java, ConcurrentFIFOCache.java,
> ConcurrentLRUCache.java, ConcurrentLRUW
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: ConcurrentFIFOCache.java, ConcurrentFIFOCache.java,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618339#action_12618339
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Nobble, thanks for feedback!
Of course my cod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: ConcurrentLRUWeakCache.java
another bug... and AtomicReference is generic... never used it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: ConcurrentLRUWeakCache.java
bug fix
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performance bo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: ConcurrentLRUWeakCache.java
Thanks Paul, I am always trying to simplify... AtomicReference is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617699#action_12617699
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Paul, I want to do it... understand me, since Febr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617692#action_12617692
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
BTW there is almost no any functional differ
Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Attached is modified version of LRUCache where
> 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617684#action_12617684
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. Fuad is after fastest-possible reads, everybod
---
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporte
--
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
>
Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Att
ance boost
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617673#action_12617673
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. The it references the map. It says explicitely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617668#action_12617668
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. No, it is not! Your analysis seems to ignore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617664#action_12617664
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. It is if nothing is modifying the map during
-
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617657#action_12617657
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Lars, I used FIFO because it is extremely simple to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617655#action_12617655
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. The eviction code looks like it would be relati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617654#action_12617654
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. The Solr admin pages will not give you e
--
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter:
Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Attached i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617639#action_12617639
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
This is extremely simple Concurrent LRU, I spen
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
>
t: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Attached is modified version of LRU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617562#action_12617562
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
{quote}Simply replacing synchronized
s.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Rem
synchronized): 9x times performance boost
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Env
Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Attached is modif
Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Attached is modified version of LRUCache where
> 1. map = new LinkedHashMap(ini
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617529#action_12617529
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
concerns are probably because of misunderstandin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617523#action_12617523
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
We need to invite Doug Lea to this discussion...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617520#action_12617520
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Shalin, we are already using _AtomicLong of Jav
rg/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaini
--
>
> Key: SOLR-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>R
e: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
>Reporter: Fuad Efendi
> Attachments: FIFOCache.java
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Attached is modified version of LRUCache wher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617516#action_12617516
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Mark, thanks for going deeper. Yes, _resize_ may ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617482#action_12617482
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
ConcurrentModificationException is thrown only whe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617481#action_12617481
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. ...and at least one of the threads modifies the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi reopened SOLR-665:
--
get() method do not need to be synchronized for FIFO cache. Unsynchronized
object retrieval is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617466#action_12617466
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Why? We have PoC at least, and we know the bottle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617454#action_12617454
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. If multiple threads access this map concurre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617445#action_12617445
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
bq. bq. absolutely no need to synchronize get() me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617443#action_12617443
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
- Classes from java.util.concurrent.atomic designed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617441#action_12617441
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Regarding Thread Safety:
- yes, we need synchron
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617359#action_12617359
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
Almost forgot: I am estimating performance gains ba
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617357#action_12617357
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-665:
--
I renamed to FIFOCache just before opening an issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuad Efendi updated SOLR-665:
-
Attachment: FIFOCache.java
> FIFO Cache (Unsynchronized): 9x times performance bo
: 1.3
Environment: JRockit R27 (Java 6)
Reporter: Fuad Efendi
Attached is modified version of LRUCache where
1. map = new LinkedHashMap(initialSize, 0.75f, false) - so that
"reordering"/true (performance bottleneck of LRU) is replaced to
"insertion-order&quo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616909#action_12616909
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-653:
--
Thanks Ryan,
Another question, add(Collection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616667#action_12616667
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-653:
--
Will it overwrite by default?
I need to up
What about commenting out this piece of outdated code in SolrServlet:
} catch (Throwable e) {
SolrException.log(log,e);
sendErr(500, SolrException.toStr(e), request, response);
}
For instance, SUN Java 5 not necessarily has resources to output
OutOfMemoryError including stack trace;
What about commenting out this piece of outdated code in SolrServlet:
} catch (Throwable e) {
SolrException.log(log,e);
sendErr(500, SolrException.toStr(e), request, response);
}
For instance, SUN Java 5 not necessarily has resources to output
OutOfMemoryError including stack trace;
> What, ConcurrentHashMap?
> I briefly considered it when I threw the caching stuff together... but
> the key here is that it's an LRUCache using LinkedHashMap, and there
> is no ConcurrentLinkedHashMap.
> -Yonik
>
There is a lot more... Ask Doug Lea, only small piece of his work is part of
Java
le overloaded CPU in 4-CPU system when faceting is enabled.
Even get() method is synchronized...
I need to learn how to use plugin jars, don't want to alter source...
Thanks!
> On 1-Apr-08, at 6:58 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> > Can we have anything better? I can't use 4-CPUs
I used it, no problem... Lucene 2.3.1 fixes bugs with autocommit, please
check their site before move...
> Can I use lucene 2.3 with Solr1.2? Is it tested?
Can we have anything better? I can't use 4-CPUs :(
Thanks!
P.S.
Blocked on lock
LRUCache.java:128
V.555343 7/11/07
Thanks...
I am thinking about making *persistent* runtime configuration options
(available via SOLR admin screen)... It would be best option... Of course we
can write (global) config file and put it somewhere, even for people "who
would expect the JVM
default configuration to work" - many people e
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
